Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2011 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"

(→‎Problem 9)
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Solution==
 
==Solution==
 +
===Solution 1===
 
Note that neither the constraint nor the expression we need to maximize involves products <math>x_i x_j</math> with <math>i \equiv j \pmod 3</math>. Factoring out say <math>x_1</math> and <math>x_4</math> we see that the constraint is <math>x_1(x_3x_5) + x_4(x_2x_6) \ge {\frac1{540}}</math>, while the expression we want to maximize is <math>x_1(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2) + x_4(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_3x_5)</math>. Adding the left side of the constraint to the expression, we get: <math>(x_1 + x_4)(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2 + x_3x_5) = (x_1 + x_4)(x_2 + x_5)(x_3 + x_6)</math>. This new expression is the product of three non-negative terms whose sum is equal to 1. By AM-GM this product is at most <math>\frac1{27}</math>. Since we have added at least <math>\frac{1}{540}</math> the desired maximum is at most <math>\frac1{27} - \frac1{540} =\frac{19}{540}</math>. It is easy to see that this upper bound can in fact be achieved by ensuring that the constraint expression is equal to <math>\frac1{540}</math> with <math>x_1 + x_4 = x_2 + x_5 = x_3 + x_6 =\frac13</math>&mdash;for example, by choosing <math>x_1</math> and <math>x_2</math> small enough&mdash;so our answer is <math>540 + 19 = \fbox{559}.</math>
 
Note that neither the constraint nor the expression we need to maximize involves products <math>x_i x_j</math> with <math>i \equiv j \pmod 3</math>. Factoring out say <math>x_1</math> and <math>x_4</math> we see that the constraint is <math>x_1(x_3x_5) + x_4(x_2x_6) \ge {\frac1{540}}</math>, while the expression we want to maximize is <math>x_1(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2) + x_4(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_3x_5)</math>. Adding the left side of the constraint to the expression, we get: <math>(x_1 + x_4)(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2 + x_3x_5) = (x_1 + x_4)(x_2 + x_5)(x_3 + x_6)</math>. This new expression is the product of three non-negative terms whose sum is equal to 1. By AM-GM this product is at most <math>\frac1{27}</math>. Since we have added at least <math>\frac{1}{540}</math> the desired maximum is at most <math>\frac1{27} - \frac1{540} =\frac{19}{540}</math>. It is easy to see that this upper bound can in fact be achieved by ensuring that the constraint expression is equal to <math>\frac1{540}</math> with <math>x_1 + x_4 = x_2 + x_5 = x_3 + x_6 =\frac13</math>&mdash;for example, by choosing <math>x_1</math> and <math>x_2</math> small enough&mdash;so our answer is <math>540 + 19 = \fbox{559}.</math>
  
Line 24: Line 25:
 
</cmath>
 
</cmath>
  
−
==Solution 2 (Not legit)==
+
===Solution 2 (Not legit)===
 
There's a symmetry between <math>x_1, x_3, x_5</math> and <math>x_2,x_4,x_6</math>. Therefore, a good guess is that <math>a = x_1 = x_3 = x_5</math> and <math>b = x_2 = x_4 = x_6</math>, at which point we know that <math>a+b = 1/3</math>, <math>a^3+b^3 \geq 1/540</math>, and we are trying to maximize <math>3a^2b+3ab^2</math>. Then,
 
There's a symmetry between <math>x_1, x_3, x_5</math> and <math>x_2,x_4,x_6</math>. Therefore, a good guess is that <math>a = x_1 = x_3 = x_5</math> and <math>b = x_2 = x_4 = x_6</math>, at which point we know that <math>a+b = 1/3</math>, <math>a^3+b^3 \geq 1/540</math>, and we are trying to maximize <math>3a^2b+3ab^2</math>. Then,
  
−
<cmath>3a^3b+3ab^2 = (a+b)^3-a^3-b^3 \leq 1/27 - 1/540 = 19/540</cmath> which is the answer.
+
<cmath>3a^2b+3ab^2 = (a+b)^3-a^3-b^3 \leq \frac{1}{27} - \frac{1}{540} = \boxed{\frac{19}{540}}</cmath> which is the answer.
  
 
This solution is extremely lucky; if you attempt to solve for <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> you receive complex answers (which contradict the problem statement), but the final answer is correct.
 
This solution is extremely lucky; if you attempt to solve for <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> you receive complex answers (which contradict the problem statement), but the final answer is correct.

Latest revision as of 14:06, 16 January 2023

Problem 9

Let $x_1, x_2, ... , x_6$ be non-negative real numbers such that $x_1 +x_2 +x_3 +x_4 +x_5 +x_6 =1$, and $x_1 x_3 x_5 +x_2 x_4 x_6 \ge {\frac{1}{540}}$. Let $p$ and $q$ be positive relatively prime integers such that $\frac{p}{q}$ is the maximum possible value of $x_1 x_2 x_3 + x_2 x_3 x_4 +x_3 x_4 x_5 +x_4 x_5 x_6 +x_5 x_6 x_1 +x_6 x_1 x_2$. Find $p+q$.

Solution

Solution 1

Note that neither the constraint nor the expression we need to maximize involves products $x_i x_j$ with $i \equiv j \pmod 3$. Factoring out say $x_1$ and $x_4$ we see that the constraint is $x_1(x_3x_5) + x_4(x_2x_6) \ge {\frac1{540}}$, while the expression we want to maximize is $x_1(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2) + x_4(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_3x_5)$. Adding the left side of the constraint to the expression, we get: $(x_1 + x_4)(x_2x_3 + x_5x_6 + x_6x_2 + x_3x_5) = (x_1 + x_4)(x_2 + x_5)(x_3 + x_6)$. This new expression is the product of three non-negative terms whose sum is equal to 1. By AM-GM this product is at most $\frac1{27}$. Since we have added at least $\frac{1}{540}$ the desired maximum is at most $\frac1{27} - \frac1{540} =\frac{19}{540}$. It is easy to see that this upper bound can in fact be achieved by ensuring that the constraint expression is equal to $\frac1{540}$ with $x_1 + x_4 = x_2 + x_5 = x_3 + x_6 =\frac13$—for example, by choosing $x_1$ and $x_2$ small enough—so our answer is $540 + 19 = \fbox{559}.$

An example is: \begin{align*} x_3 &= x_6 = \frac16 \\ x_1 &= x_2 = \frac{5 - \sqrt{20}}{30} \\ x_5 &= x_4 = \frac{5 + \sqrt{20}}{30} \end{align*}

Another example is \begin{align*} x_1 = x_3 = \frac{1}{3} \\ x_2 = \frac{19}{60}, \ x_5 = \frac{1}{60} \\ x_4 &= x_6 = 0 \end{align*}

Solution 2 (Not legit)

There's a symmetry between $x_1, x_3, x_5$ and $x_2,x_4,x_6$. Therefore, a good guess is that $a = x_1 = x_3 = x_5$ and $b = x_2 = x_4 = x_6$, at which point we know that $a+b = 1/3$, $a^3+b^3 \geq 1/540$, and we are trying to maximize $3a^2b+3ab^2$. Then,

\[3a^2b+3ab^2 = (a+b)^3-a^3-b^3 \leq \frac{1}{27} - \frac{1}{540} = \boxed{\frac{19}{540}}\] which is the answer.

This solution is extremely lucky; if you attempt to solve for $a$ and $b$ you receive complex answers (which contradict the problem statement), but the final answer is correct.

See also

2011 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 8 		Followed by
Problem 10
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2011_AIME_II_Problems/Problem_9&oldid=186850"