Difference between revisions of "User:Unknownmonkey"
Robotseman (talk | contribs) |
Robotseman (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
UnknownMonkey was here <br /> | UnknownMonkey was here <br /> | ||
RedFireTruck was here <br /> | RedFireTruck was here <br /> | ||
| − | awin was here | + | awin was here <br /> |
| − | robotsEMAN <br /> | + | robotsEMAN was here <br /> |
For more information about me, visit my profile page here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/user/285827 | For more information about me, visit my profile page here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/user/285827 | ||
Latest revision as of 14:43, 14 December 2020
Hi
You can put [your username] was here below if you want.
UnknownMonkey was here
RedFireTruck was here
awin was here
robotsEMAN was here
For more information about me, visit my profile page here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/user/285827
Contents
Proof that Everyone is Pro
Proof by Induction
We start with a pro person, such as rrusczyk. Other people say the pro person is pro. The pro person says “no u” back. The pro person is still pro because the other people say the pro person is pro and pro people say no u even though they are pro. The pro person said “no u” to the other person, so now the other person is pro. The pattern repeats; people say the other person is pro, the other person says “no u,” and then the people become pro. -UnknownMonkey
Proof by UnknownMonkey
(Warning: the next statement may be false) We assume that UnknownMonkey is pro. UnknownMonkey says everyone is pro. Therefore, everyone is pro. -UnknownMonkey
Proof by Capability
Everyone is good at something, or capable of becoming good at something. That means everyone fits my definition of pro. -UnknownMonkey
Feel free to add another proof, with a unique name, and put your username at the end of the proof.
