Difference between revisions of "2016 APMO Problems/Problem 5"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
− | This gives us the power to compute <math>f(1)</math>. From <math>P(1,1,1)</math> we get <math>f(f(1)+1)=f(2)</math> and injectivity gives <math>f(1)=1</math>. | + | This gives us the power to compute <math>f(1)</math>. From <math>P(1,1,1)</math> we get <math>f(f(1)+1)=f(2)</math> and injectivity gives <math>f(1)=1</math>. Showing that <math>f</math> is unbounded above is also easy as we can fix <math>(x,y)</math> and let <math>z</math> blow up to <math>\infty</math> in the original Functional equation.. |
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<cmath>(z+1)f(2x)=2f(x+xf(z)) \iff \frac{(z+1)f(2x)}{2}=f(x+xf(z))</cmath> | <cmath>(z+1)f(2x)=2f(x+xf(z)) \iff \frac{(z+1)f(2x)}{2}=f(x+xf(z))</cmath> | ||
− | This gives that <math>\text{Im}(f) \in \left(\frac{f(2x)}{2},\infty\right)</math>. Putting <math>x=\frac{1}{2}</math>, we get <math>\text{Im}(f) \in \left(\frac{1}{2},\infty\right)</math>. | + | This gives that <math>\text{Im}(f) \in \left(\frac{f(2x)}{2},\infty\right)</math>. Putting <math>x=\frac{1}{2}</math>, we get <math>\text{Im}(f) \in \left(\frac{1}{2},\infty\right)</math>. By induction, surjectivity is proved as <math>\lim_{m \to \infty}\frac{1}{2^m}=0</math> and we are essentially done. <math>\square</math> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Now, we have claim that if <math>a+b=c+d</math> for some <math>a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{R}^+</math>, then <math>f(a)+f(b)=f(c)+f(d)</math>. This can be achieved by putting <math>a=xf(z)+y</math>, <math>b=yf(z)+x</math>, <math>c=x'f(z)+y'</math> and <math>d=y'f(z)+x'</math>. Let us calculate <math>f(a)+f(b)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>f(a)+f(b)=(z+1)f(x+y)=(z+1)f\left(\frac{a+b}{f(z)+1}\right)=(z+1)f\left(\frac{c+d}{f(z)+1}\right)=(z+1)f(x'+y')=f(c)+f(d)</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Everything is fine, but we would have show that such numbers <math>x,y,x',y' \in \mathbb{R}^+</math> do exist. We will show this in the next lemma. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Lemma 1:</b> There exits <math>x,y,x',y',a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{R}^+</math> such that | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | a=xf(z)+y \\ | ||
+ | b=yf(z)+x \\ | ||
+ | c=x'f(z)+y' \\ | ||
+ | d=y'f(z)+x' | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | <i>Proof:</i> Notice that <math>f</math> is surjective. So, we will solve for <math>x,y,x',y'</math> in the system of linear equation. For convinience, let <math>f(z)=k</math> for <math>k \in \mathbb{R}^+</math> as <math>f</math> is surjective. Solving we get: | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | x=\frac{ka-b}{k^2-1}\\ | ||
+ | y=\frac{kb-a}{k^2-1} \\ | ||
+ | x'=\frac{kc-d}{k^2-1} \\ | ||
+ | y'=\frac{kd-c}{k^2-1} | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | Now, you can chose <math>z</math> such that <math>f(z)\ne 1</math> and <math>x,y,x',y'</math> is positive. This finishes the proof to the lemma. <math>\square</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Claim 3:</b> <math>f</math> obeys Jensen's Functional Equation,i.e., | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}=f\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)</cmath> | ||
+ | <i>Proof:</i> |
Latest revision as of 08:20, 14 July 2021
Problem
Find all functions such that for all positive real numbers .
Solution
We claim that is the only solution. It is easy to check that it works. Now, we will break things down in several claims. Let be the assertion to the Functional Equation.
Claim 1: is injective.
Proof: Assume for some . Now, from and we have:
Now comparing, we have as desired.
This gives us the power to compute . From we get and injectivity gives . Showing that is unbounded above is also easy as we can fix and let blow up to in the original Functional equation..
Claim 2: is surjective.
Proof: gives
This gives that . Putting , we get . By induction, surjectivity is proved as and we are essentially done.
Now, we have claim that if for some , then . This can be achieved by putting , , and . Let us calculate
Everything is fine, but we would have show that such numbers do exist. We will show this in the next lemma.
Lemma 1: There exits such that
Proof: Notice that is surjective. So, we will solve for in the system of linear equation. For convinience, let for as is surjective. Solving we get:
Now, you can chose such that and is positive. This finishes the proof to the lemma.
Claim 3: obeys Jensen's Functional Equation,i.e., Proof: