Difference between revisions of "2007 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Diagram) |
m (→Solution 3) |
||
(54 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
import olympiad; | import olympiad; | ||
real c=8.1,a=5*(c+sqrt(c^2-64))/6,b=5*(c-sqrt(c^2-64))/6; | real c=8.1,a=5*(c+sqrt(c^2-64))/6,b=5*(c-sqrt(c^2-64))/6; | ||
− | pair A=(0,0),B=(c,0), | + | pair A=(0,0),B=(c,0),R=(c/2,-sqrt(25-(c/2)^2)); |
pair C=intersectionpoints(circle(A,b),circle(B,a))[0]; | pair C=intersectionpoints(circle(A,b),circle(B,a))[0]; | ||
+ | pair K = midpoint(B--C); | ||
+ | pair L = midpoint(A--C); | ||
pair I=incenter(A,B,C); | pair I=incenter(A,B,C); | ||
− | pair | + | pair O = circumcenter(A,B,C); |
− | dot(A^^B^^C^^ | + | dot(O); |
− | draw(C-- | + | dot(A^^B^^C^^R^^K^^L); |
− | + | draw(C--R); | |
− | draw(circumcircle(A,B, | + | draw(circumcircle(A,B,R)); |
draw(A--C--B); | draw(A--C--B); | ||
− | label("$A$",A,SW | + | draw(A--B); |
− | label("$B$",B,SE, | + | label("$A$",A,SW); |
− | label("$C$",C, | + | label("$B$",B,SE); |
− | label("$ | + | label("$C$",C,N); |
+ | label("$R$",R,S); | ||
+ | label("$K$",K,N); | ||
+ | label("$L$",L,S); | ||
+ | label("$O$",O,N); | ||
+ | draw(K--O); | ||
+ | draw(L--O); | ||
+ | pair Q = intersectionpoint(L--O, C--R); | ||
+ | dot(Q); | ||
+ | label("$Q$",Q,SW); | ||
+ | pair E = midpoint(C--R); | ||
+ | dot(E); | ||
+ | label("$E$",E,W); | ||
+ | draw(O--E, dashed); | ||
+ | pair P = intersectionpoint(O--(c/2-1.2,0), C--R); | ||
+ | dot(P); | ||
+ | label("$P$",P,W); | ||
+ | draw(O--P); | ||
+ | draw(R--L, dashed); | ||
+ | draw(R--K, dashed); | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</asy> | </asy> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~KingRavi | ||
== Solution 1 (Efficient) == | == Solution 1 (Efficient) == | ||
− | + | <math>\angle{RQL} = 90+\angle{QCL} = 90+\dfrac{C}{2}</math>, and similarly <math>\angle{RPK} = 90+\angle{PCK} = 90+\dfrac{C}{2}</math>. Therefore, <math>\angle{RQL} = \angle{RPK}</math>. Using the triangle area formula <math>A = \dfrac{1}{2}bc\sin{\angle{A}}</math> yields <math>RQ \cdot QL = RP \cdot PK = \dfrac{PK}{QL} = \dfrac{RQ}{RP}</math> after cancelling the sines and constant. Draw line <math>QD</math> perpendicular to <math>BC</math> that intersects <math>BC</math> at <math>D</math>, then <math>QD=QL</math> because the perpendicular bisectors are congruent, (or alternatively <math>\triangle QDC\cong\triangle QLC</math>). This presents us <math>\dfrac{PK}{QL}=\dfrac{PK}{QD}=\dfrac{PC}{QC}</math> by similar triangles; now, we have only to prove <math>\dfrac{PC}{QC}=\dfrac{RQ}{RP}</math>, or <math>RQ \cdot QC=RP \cdot PC</math>. | |
− | Since <math>\angle{OPQ}= | + | Since <math>\angle{OPQ} =1 80-\angle{RPK} =1 80-\angle{RQL} = \angle{OQP}</math>, we have <math>\triangle OPQ</math> is isosceles. Draw the perpendicular from <math>O</math> to <math>RC</math>, intersecting at <math>E</math>. Then <math>PE = QE = x</math> for a real <math>x</math>, now because the perpendicular from the center of a circle to a chord bisects that chord, <math>RE = CE</math>. Let <math>y = RE</math>, and then <math>RQ \cdot QC = (y+x) \cdot (y-x) = PC \cdot RP</math>, proving our claim. |
− | ==Alternative Solution (Power of a Point)== | + | == Alternative END Solution (Power of a Point) == |
− | + | ||
− | + | Since <math>\angle{OPQ}=180-\angle{RPK}=180-\angle{RQL}=\angle{OQP}</math>, we have <math>OQ=OP=x</math>. Let the radius of the circumcircle be <math>r</math>, then the diameter through <math>P</math> is divided by point <math>P</math> into lengths of <math>r+x</math> and <math>r-x</math>. By power of point, <math>RP*PC=(r+x)(r-x)</math>. Similarly, <math>RQ*QC=(r+x)(r-x)</math>. Therefore <math>RP*PC=RQ*QC</math>. <math>\square</math> | |
Solution by ~KingRavi | Solution by ~KingRavi | ||
Alternate Solution by ~mathdummy | Alternate Solution by ~mathdummy | ||
+ | |||
+ | Edifying edits made by ~TheGrandioseGeometrician | ||
==Solution 2== | ==Solution 2== | ||
Line 69: | Line 97: | ||
<cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}a\tan\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{a\sin\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> | <cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}a\tan\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{a\sin\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> | ||
<cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}a\sin\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{a\sin\frac{1}{2}C\cos\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> | <cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}a\sin\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{a\sin\frac{1}{2}C\cos\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> | ||
− | <cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{2\sin \frac{1}{2}C\cos\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> | + | <cmath>= \dfrac{\sin\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{2\sin \frac{1}{2}C\cos\frac{1}{2}C} </cmath> |
− | <cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{\sin C} </cmath> | + | <cmath>= \dfrac{\sin\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{\sin C} </cmath> |
− | <cmath>= \dfrac{\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{c} </cmath> | + | <cmath>= \dfrac{\sin\frac{1}{2}C \cdot (a + b)}{c} </cmath> |
<cmath>= CR. </cmath> | <cmath>= CR. </cmath> | ||
Thus, <math>RF = \dfrac{1}{2}b.</math> In this way, we get that the altidude from <math>R</math> to <math>QL</math> has length <math>\dfrac{1}{2}a.</math> Therefore, we see that <math>[RPK] = \dfrac{1}{8}ab \tan \frac{1}{2}C</math> and <math>[RQL] = \dfrac{1}{8}ab \tan \frac{1}{2}C,</math> so the two areas are equal. | Thus, <math>RF = \dfrac{1}{2}b.</math> In this way, we get that the altidude from <math>R</math> to <math>QL</math> has length <math>\dfrac{1}{2}a.</math> Therefore, we see that <math>[RPK] = \dfrac{1}{8}ab \tan \frac{1}{2}C</math> and <math>[RQL] = \dfrac{1}{8}ab \tan \frac{1}{2}C,</math> so the two areas are equal. | ||
− | Solution by Ilikeapos | + | Solution by Ilikeapos |
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 4== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>[\triangle{RPK}]=[\triangle{RQL}], LQ*RQ*\sin\angle{LQR}=KP*PR*\sin\angle{RPK}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>CR</math> bisects <math>\angle{ACB},\angle{QCL}=\angle{PCK}</math>, <math>OL,OK</math> are perpendicular to sides <math>AC,BC</math> separately, <math>\angle{QLC}=\angle{PKC}=90^{\circ}, \angle{CQL}=\angle{CPK}, \angle{LQR}=\angle{RPK}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | So now, we only have to prove <math>RP*PK=LQ*QR</math>, which is <math>RP*(CQ+QP)*\cos\angle{CPK}=CQ*(QP+PR)*\cos\angle{CQL}</math>, as mentioned above, the two angles are the same, we have to prove that <math>RP(CQ+QP)=CQ(QP+PR)</math>, which is equivalent to <math>RP*QP=QP*CQ</math>, we have to prove <math>RP=CQ</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now notice that <math>\triangle{OQP}</math> is isosceles. <math>\angle{CQL}=\angle{OQP}=\angle{OPQ}</math>, construct <math>OJ \bot CR</math>, <math>CJ=JR,JQ=JP,CQ=PR</math> as desired | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~bluesoul | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} |
Latest revision as of 13:52, 5 August 2022
Contents
Problem
In the bisector of intersects the circumcircle again at , the perpendicular bisector of at , and the perpendicular bisector of at . The midpoint of is and the midpoint of is . Prove that the triangles and have the same area.
Diagram
~KingRavi
Solution 1 (Efficient)
, and similarly . Therefore, . Using the triangle area formula yields after cancelling the sines and constant. Draw line perpendicular to that intersects at , then because the perpendicular bisectors are congruent, (or alternatively ). This presents us by similar triangles; now, we have only to prove , or .
Since , we have is isosceles. Draw the perpendicular from to , intersecting at . Then for a real , now because the perpendicular from the center of a circle to a chord bisects that chord, . Let , and then , proving our claim.
Alternative END Solution (Power of a Point)
Since , we have . Let the radius of the circumcircle be , then the diameter through is divided by point into lengths of and . By power of point, . Similarly, . Therefore .
Solution by ~KingRavi
Alternate Solution by ~mathdummy
Edifying edits made by ~TheGrandioseGeometrician
Solution 2
The area of is given by and the area of is . Let , , and . Now and , thus . , so , or . The ratio of the areas is . The two areas are only equal when the ratio is 1, therefore it suffices to show . Let be the center of the circle. Then , and . Using law of sines on we have: so . by law of sines, and , thus 1) . Similarly, law of sines on results in or . Cross multiplying we have or 2) . Dividing 1) by 2) we have
Solution 3
WLOG, let the diameter of be
We see that and from right triangles and
We now look at By the Extended Law of Sines on we get that Similarly,
We now look at By Ptolemy's Theorem, we have which gives us This means that We now seek to relate the lengths computed with the areas.
To do this, we consider the altitude from to This is to find the area of Finding the area of is similar.
We claim that In order to prove this, we will prove that In other words, we wish to prove that This is equivalent to proving that
Note that and Therefore, we get that Thus, In this way, we get that the altidude from to has length Therefore, we see that and so the two areas are equal.
Solution by Ilikeapos
Solution 4
Since bisects , are perpendicular to sides separately,
So now, we only have to prove , which is , as mentioned above, the two angles are the same, we have to prove that , which is equivalent to , we have to prove
Now notice that is isosceles. , construct , as desired
~bluesoul
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
2007 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |