|
|
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Division of '''Zero by Zero''', is an '''unexplained mystery''', since decades in field of Mathematics and is refereed as undefined. This is been a great mystery to solve for any mathematician and rather to use '''limits''' to set value of '''Zero by Zero''' in '''[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwij6oLv_OvwAhVT83MBHc1LCzQQFjAHegQIDhAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDifferential_calculus%23%3A~%3Atext%3DIn%2520mathematics%252C%2520differential%2520calculus%2520is%2Cthe%2520area%2520beneath%2520a%2520curve.&usg=AOvVaw1YROgVEzpqoR0TXuAWa-Ju differential calculus]''' one of the Indian-Mathematical-Scientist '''[[Jyotiraditya Jadhav]]''' has got correct solution set for the process with a proof.
| + | '''Division of Zero by Zero''', is a mathematical concept and is [[indeterminate]]. |
| | | |
− | == About Zero and it's Operators == | + | == Proof of Indeterminacy == |
| | | |
− | === Discovery === | + | We let <math>x=\frac{0}{0}</math>. Rearranging, we get <math>x\cdot0=0</math> there are infinite solutions for this. |
− | The first recorded '''zero''' appeared in Mesopotamia around 3 B.C. The Mayans invented it independently circa 4 A.D. It was later devised in India in the mid-fifth century, spread to Cambodia near the end of the seventh century, and into China and the Islamic countries at the end of the eighth
| |
| | | |
− | === Operators ===
| |
− | "'''Zero''' and its '''operation''' are first '''defined''' by [Hindu astronomer and mathematician] Brahmagupta in 628," said Gobets. He developed a symbol for '''zero''': a dot underneath numbers.
| |
| | | |
− | == Detailed proof ==
| + | {{stub}} |
− | We will form two solution sets (namely set(A) and set(B))
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Solution set(A):
| |
− | | |
− | If we divide zero by zero then
| |
− | | |
− | <math>0/0</math>
| |
− | | |
− | We can write the 0 in the numerator as <math>(1-1) </math> and in the denominator as <math>(1-1)</math>,
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | =<math>(1-1)/(1-1)</math> equaling <math>1</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | We can then write the 0 in the numerator as <math>(2-2) </math> and in the denominator as <math>(1-1)</math>,
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | =<math>(2-2)/(1-1) </math>
| |
− | | |
− | = <math>2 (1-1)/(1-1) </math> [Taking 2 as common]
| |
− | | |
− | = <math>2 </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | We can even write the 0 in the numerator as <math>( \infty- \infty) </math> and in the denominator as <math>(1-1)</math>,
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | =<math>( \infty-\infty)/(1-1) </math>
| |
− | | |
− | = <math> \infty(1-1)/(1-1) </math> [Taking <math> \infty</math> as common]
| |
− | | |
− | = <math> \infty</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | So, the solution set(A) comprises of all real numbers.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | set(A) = <math>\{- \infty.....-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3.... \infty\} </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Solution set(B):
| |
− | | |
− | If we divide zero by zero then
| |
− | | |
− | <math>0/0</math>
| |
− | | |
− | We know that the actual equation is <math>0^1/0^1 </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | =<math>0^1/0^1 </math>
| |
− | | |
− | = 0^(1-1) [Laws of Indices, <math>a^m/a^n = a^{m-n} </math>]
| |
− | | |
− | = <math>0^0 </math>
| |
− | | |
− | =<math>1 </math> [Already proven<ref>https://brilliant.org/wiki/what-is-00/</ref>]
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | So, the solution set(B) is a singleton set
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | set(B) =<math>\{1\} </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Now we can get a finite value to division of <math>0/0 </math> by taking the intersection of both the solution sets.
| |
− | | |
− | Let the final solution set be <math>F </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | <math>A\bigcap B </math> = <math>F </math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\{- \infty.....-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3....\infty\} </math> <math>\bigcap </math> <math>\{1\} </math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>F </math> = <math>\{1\} </math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Hence proving <math>0/0 =1 </math>
| |