Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "Complete Quadrilateral"

(→‎Areas in complete quadrilateral)
(→‎Shatunov-Tokarev line)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
<i><b>Proof</b></i>
 
<i><b>Proof</b></i>
  
−
Let <math>X_1, Y_1, D_1, C_1, Z_1,</math> and <math>F_1</math> be the projections of <math>X, Y, A, B, Z,</math> and <math>E,</math> respectively onto <math>CD.</math>  
+
[[File:Complete areas 1.png|400px|right]]
 +
Let <math>X_1, Y_1, D_1, C_1, Z_1,</math> and <math>F_1</math> be the projections of <math>X, Y, A, B, Z,</math> and <math>E,</math> respectively onto <math>CD.</math>
 +
 
Let <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> be the circles with diameters <math>AD, BC,</math> and <math>EF,</math> respectively.  
 
Let <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> be the circles with diameters <math>AD, BC,</math> and <math>EF,</math> respectively.  
−
<math>\angle EF_1F = 90^\circ \implies F_1 \in \Omega.</math> Similarly <math>D_1 \in \omega, C_1 \in \theta.</math>
+
<cmath>\angle EF_1F = 90^\circ \implies F_1 \in \Omega.</cmath>
 +
Similarly <math>D_1 \in \omega, C_1 \in \theta.</math>
 +
 
 
Let common radical axes of <math>\omega, \Omega,</math> and <math>\theta</math> cross <math>CD</math> at point <math>G.</math>
 
Let common radical axes of <math>\omega, \Omega,</math> and <math>\theta</math> cross <math>CD</math> at point <math>G.</math>
−
<math>EF_1 || AD_1 \implies \frac {EC}{F_1C} = \frac {AC}{D_1C}.</math>
+
<cmath>EF_1 || AD_1 \implies \frac {EC}{AC} = \frac {F_1C}{D_1C}.</cmath>
−
The power of the point <math>G</math> with respect <math>\omega, theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> is the same, therefore
+
The power of the point <math>G</math> with respect <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> is the same, therefore
−
<math>GF \cdot GF_1 = GC \cdot GC_1 = GD \cdot GD_1 \implies </math>
+
<cmath>GF \cdot GF_1 = GC \cdot GC_1 = GD \cdot GD_1 \implies </cmath>
−
<math>(G - F) \cdot (G - F_1) = (G - C) \cdot (G - C_1) = (G - D) \cdot (G – D_1) \implies </math>  
+
<cmath>(\vec G - \vec F) \cdot (\vec G - \vec F_1) = (\vec G - \vec C) \cdot (\vec G - \vec C_1) = (\vec G - \vec D) \cdot (\vec G – \vec D_1) \implies </cmath>  
−
<cmath>F \cdot F_1 – G \cdot (F + F_1) = F \cdot F_1 – G \cdot 2Z_1 = C \cdot C_1 – G \cdot (C + C_1) =</cmath>
+
<cmath>\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec F + \vec F_1) = \vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot 2\vec Z_1 = \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec C + \vec C_1) =</cmath>
−
<math></math>= C \cdot C_1 – G \cdot 2X_1 = D \cdot D_1 – G \cdot (D + D_1) = D \cdot D_1 – G \cdot 2Y_1 \implies<math>
+
<cmath>= \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec X_1 = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec D + \vec D_1) = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec Y_1 \implies</cmath>
−
</math>G = \frac {F \cdot F_1 – C \cdot C_1}{2(Z_1 - X_1)} = \frac {F \cdot F_1 – D \cdot D_1}{2(Z_1 – Y_1)} \implies<math>
+
 
−
</math>\frac {Z_1 - X_1}{Z_1 - Y_1} =  \frac {F \cdot F_1 – C \cdot C_1} {F \cdot F_1 – D \cdot D_1}<math>
+
<cmath>|\vec G| = \frac {\vec F \cdot\vec  F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1}{2|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|} = \frac {\vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1}{2|\vec Y_1 – \vec X_1|} \implies</cmath>
−
</math>\frac {Z - X}{Z - Y} = \frac {ZX}{ZY} = \frac {FC \cdot F_1C} {DC \cdot D_1C} = \frac {FC \cdot DC} {EC \cdot BC} = \frac {[CEF]}{[CAD]}.$
+
<cmath>\frac {|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|}{|\vec Y_1 - \vec X_1|} =  \frac {\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1} {\vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec C \cdot\vec C_1} = \frac {Z_1X_1}{Y_1X_1} = \frac {ZX}{YX} .</cmath>
−
Therefore  <cmath>\frac {[ADEF]}{[ACD]} =  \frac {[CEF]-[CAD]}{[CAD]} =\frac {ZX - ZY}{ZY} = \frac {XY}{ZY}.</cmath>
+
Let <math>\vec C = \vec 0 \implies \vec C \cdot\vec C_1 = 0, \vec F \cdot \vec F_1 = FC \cdot F_1C, \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 = DC \cdot D_1C.</math>
 +
<cmath>\frac {ZX}{YX} = \frac {FC \cdot F_1C} {DC \cdot D_1C} = \frac {FC \cdot EC} {DC \cdot AC} = \frac {[CEF]}{[CAD]}.</cmath>
 +
 
 +
Therefore  <cmath>\frac {[ADEF]}{[CAD]} =  \frac {[CEF]-[CAD]}{[CAD]} =\frac {ZX - YX}{YX} = \frac {ZY}{YX}.</cmath>
  
 
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
 
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
Line 116: Line 123:
  
 
Therefore line <math>P'Q'</math> coincide with Steiner line and line <math>PQ</math> is symmetric to Steiner line with respect <math>G</math> and is parallel to this line.
 
Therefore line <math>P'Q'</math> coincide with Steiner line and line <math>PQ</math> is symmetric to Steiner line with respect <math>G</math> and is parallel to this line.
 +
 +
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
 +
==Complete quadrilateral theorem==
 +
[[File:Complete quadrilateral map.png|350px|right]]
 +
Let points <math>A, B, C, D,</math> no three of which are collinear, be given.
 +
<cmath>P = AD \cap BC, Q = AC \cap BD, E = AB \cap PQ, F = CD \cap PQ.</cmath>
 +
Prove that <math>\frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF} = 1.</math>
 +
 +
<i><b>Proof</b></i>
 +
 +
We make the projective transformation of the vertices of <math>ABCD</math> into vertices of the square. ([[Projective geometry (simplest cases) |Projecting non-convex quadrilateral into rectangle]])
 +
Then image of the point <math>P</math> is the point at infinity, image of <math>Q</math> is the center of the square, images of <math>AD, PQ,</math> and <math>BC</math> are parallel, so for images <math>QF = QE</math> and <cmath>\frac {PE}{PF} = 1  \implies \frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF} = 1.</cmath>
 +
 +
The double ratio <math>\frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF}</math> is the projective invariant of a quadruple of collinear points <math>(P,Q;E,F)</math> so the equality also holds for the preimages.
  
 
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
 
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''

Latest revision as of 03:42, 21 November 2024

Complete quadrilateral

Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral. In the diagram these are $\triangle ABC, \triangle ADE, \triangle CEF, \triangle BDF.$ One can see some of the properties of this configuration and their proof using the following links.

Radical axis

Complete radical axes.png

Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral. In the diagram these are $\triangle ABC, \triangle ADE, \triangle CEF, \triangle BDF.$

Let points $H,$ and $H_A$ be the orthocenters of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle ADE,$ respectively.

Let circles $\omega, \theta,$ and $\Omega$ be the circles with diameters $CD, BE,$ and $AF,$ respectively. Prove that Steiner line $HH_A$ is the radical axis of $\omega, \theta,$ and $\Omega.$

Proof

Let points $G, K, L, N, P,$ and $Q$ be the foots of perpendiculars $AH_A, CH, DH_A, BH, AH,$ and $EH_A,$ respectively.

Denote $Po(X)_{\omega}$ power of point $X$ with respect the circle $\omega.$ \[\angle AGF = 90^\circ \implies G \in \Omega \implies Po(H_A)_{\Omega} = AH_A \cdot GH_A.\] \[\angle APF = 90^\circ \implies P \in \Omega \implies Po(H)_{\Omega} = AH \cdot PH_A.\] \[\angle CLD = 90^\circ \implies L \in \omega \implies Po(H_A)_{\omega} = DH_A \cdot LH_A = AH_A \cdot GH_A = Po(H_A)_{\Omega}.\] \[\angle EQB = 90^\circ \implies Q \in \theta \implies Po(H_A)_{\theta} = EH_A \cdot QH_A = AH_A \cdot GH_A = Po(H_A)_{\Omega}.\]

\[\angle BNE = 90^\circ \implies N \in \theta \implies Po(H)_{\theta} = BH \cdot NH = AH \cdot PH = Po(H)_{\Omega}.\] \[\angle CKD = 90^\circ \implies K \in \theta \implies Po(H)_{\omega} = CH \cdot KH = AH \cdot PH = Po(H)_{\Omega}.\] Therefore power of point $H (H_A)$ with respect these three circles is the same. These points lies on the common radical axis of $\omega, \theta,$ and $\Omega \implies$ Steiner line $HH_A$ is the radical axis as desired.

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Areas in complete quadrilateral

Complete areas.png

Let complete quadrilateral $ABCDEF$ be given $(E = AC \cap BD, F = AB \cap CD)$. Let $X, Y,$ and $Z$ be the midpoints of $BC, AD,$ and $EF,$ respectively.

Prove that $\frac {[ADFE]}{[ADC]} = \frac {ZY}{XY},$ where $[t]$ is the area of $t.$

Proof

Complete areas 1.png

Let $X_1, Y_1, D_1, C_1, Z_1,$ and $F_1$ be the projections of $X, Y, A, B, Z,$ and $E,$ respectively onto $CD.$

Let $\omega, \theta,$ and $\Omega$ be the circles with diameters $AD, BC,$ and $EF,$ respectively. \[\angle EF_1F = 90^\circ \implies F_1 \in \Omega.\] Similarly $D_1 \in \omega, C_1 \in \theta.$

Let common radical axes of $\omega, \Omega,$ and $\theta$ cross $CD$ at point $G.$ \[EF_1 || AD_1 \implies \frac {EC}{AC} = \frac {F_1C}{D_1C}.\] The power of the point $G$ with respect $\omega, \theta,$ and $\Omega$ is the same, therefore \[GF \cdot GF_1 = GC \cdot GC_1 = GD \cdot GD_1 \implies\] \[(\vec G - \vec F) \cdot (\vec G - \vec F_1) = (\vec G - \vec C) \cdot (\vec G - \vec C_1) = (\vec G - \vec D) \cdot (\vec G – \vec D_1) \implies\] \[\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec F + \vec F_1) = \vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot 2\vec Z_1 = \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec C + \vec C_1) =\] \[= \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec X_1 = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec D + \vec D_1) = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec Y_1 \implies\]

\[|\vec G| = \frac {\vec F \cdot\vec F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1}{2|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|} = \frac {\vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1}{2|\vec Y_1 – \vec X_1|} \implies\] \[\frac {|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|}{|\vec Y_1 - \vec X_1|} = \frac {\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1} {\vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec C \cdot\vec C_1} = \frac {Z_1X_1}{Y_1X_1} = \frac {ZX}{YX} .\] Let $\vec C = \vec 0 \implies \vec C \cdot\vec C_1 = 0, \vec F \cdot \vec F_1 = FC \cdot F_1C, \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 = DC \cdot D_1C.$ \[\frac {ZX}{YX} = \frac {FC \cdot F_1C} {DC \cdot D_1C} = \frac {FC \cdot EC} {DC \cdot AC} = \frac {[CEF]}{[CAD]}.\]

Therefore \[\frac {[ADEF]}{[CAD]} = \frac {[CEF]-[CAD]}{[CAD]} =\frac {ZX - YX}{YX} = \frac {ZY}{YX}.\]

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Newton–Gauss line

Complete perpendicular.png

Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral.

In the diagram these are $\triangle ABC, \triangle ADE, \triangle CEF, \triangle BDF.$

Let points $K, L,$ and $N$ be the midpoints of $BE, CD,$ and $AF,$ respectively.

Let points $H$ and $H_A$ be the orthocenters of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle ADE,$ respectively.

Prove that Steiner line $HH_A$ is perpendicular to Gauss line $KLN.$

Proof

Points $K, L,$ and $N$ are the centers of circles with diameters $BE, CD,$ and $AF,$ respectively.

Steiner line $HH_A$ is the radical axis of these circles.

Therefore $HH_A \perp KL$ as desired.

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Shatunov-Tokarev line

Shatunov line 3.png

Let the complete quadrilateral ABCDEF be labeled as in the diagram. Quadrilateral $BCED$ is not cyclic.

Let points $H, H_A, H_B, H_C$ be the orthocenters and points $O, O_A, O_B, O_C$ be the circumcenters of $\triangle ABC, \triangle ADE, \triangle BDF,$ and $\triangle CEF,$ respectively.

Let bisector $BD$ cross bisector $CE$ at point $Q.$ Let bisector $BC$ cross bisector $DE$ at point $P.$

Prove that

a) points $P$ and $Q$ lie on circumcircle of $\triangle OO_AO_C,$

b) line $PQ$ is symmetric to Steiner line with respect centroid of $BDEC.$

I suppose that this line was found independently by two young mathematicians Leonid Shatunov and Alexander Tokarev in 2022. I would be grateful for information on whether this line was previously known.

Proof

Shatunov line 2.png

a) Points $P$ and $O$ lies on bisector of $BC,$ points $P$ and $O_A$ lies on bisector of $DE \implies$

$\angle OPO_A + \angle OO_CO_A = 180^\circ \implies P \in$ circle $OO_AO_C.$

Similarly $P \in$ circle $OO_BO_C$ as desired.

b) Let $M, M', P'$ and $G$ be midpoints of $CE, BD, HH_A,$ and $MM',$ respectively.

It is clear that $G$ is centroid of $BDEC.$

$M'P \perp BD, EH_A \perp AD, CH \perp AB \implies MP' \perp AB$ (midline of trapezium $ECHH_A) \implies EH_A||MP'||CH||M'P.$ \[MP \perp CE, DH_A \perp AE, BH \perp AC \implies\] $M'P' \perp AB$ (midline of trapezium $HBDH_A) \implies$ $DH_A||M'P'||BH||MP \implies M'P'MP$ is parallelogram.

Similarly one can prove that point $Q',$ the midpoint of $H_BH_C,$ is symmetric to $Q$ with respect $G.$

Therefore line $P'Q'$ coincide with Steiner line and line $PQ$ is symmetric to Steiner line with respect $G$ and is parallel to this line.

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Complete quadrilateral theorem

Complete quadrilateral map.png

Let points $A, B, C, D,$ no three of which are collinear, be given. \[P = AD \cap BC, Q = AC \cap BD, E = AB \cap PQ, F = CD \cap PQ.\] Prove that $\frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF} = 1.$

Proof

We make the projective transformation of the vertices of $ABCD$ into vertices of the square. (Projecting non-convex quadrilateral into rectangle) Then image of the point $P$ is the point at infinity, image of $Q$ is the center of the square, images of $AD, PQ,$ and $BC$ are parallel, so for images $QF = QE$ and \[\frac {PE}{PF} = 1 \implies \frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF} = 1.\]

The double ratio $\frac{QE \cdot PF}{PE \cdot QF}$ is the projective invariant of a quadruple of collinear points $(P,Q;E,F)$ so the equality also holds for the preimages.

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=Complete_Quadrilateral&oldid=235220"