Difference between revisions of "2024 USAJMO Problems/Problem 3"
(→Solution 1) |
m (→Solution 1) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Then, we get that if <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math>, then <math>0\equiv a(m)\equiv (a(m-1))^m-1\mod p\implies (a(m-1))^{m+1}\equiv 1\equiv a(m-1)\mod p</math>. | Then, we get that if <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math>, then <math>0\equiv a(m)\equiv (a(m-1))^m-1\mod p\implies (a(m-1))^{m+1}\equiv 1\equiv a(m-1)\mod p</math>. | ||
− | Then, by LTE, <math>v_p(a(m))=v_p((a(m-1))^m-1)=v_p(a(m-1)-1)+v_p(m)>v_p(m)</math>. Since <math>\gcd(p-1,p)=1</math>, then <math>\gcd(p-1,p^k)=1</math> for all positive integers <math>k</math>, so then by | + | Then, by LTE, <math>v_p(a(m))=v_p((a(m-1))^m-1)=v_p(a(m-1)-1)+v_p(m)>v_p(m)</math>. Since <math>\gcd(p-1,p)=1</math>, then <math>\gcd(p-1,p^k)=1</math> for all positive integers <math>k</math>, so then by Chinese Remainder Theorem there exists integers <math>m</math> such that <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math> and <math>m\equiv 0\mod p^k</math>, so we are done <math>\square</math> |
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
− | -bronzetruck2016 | + | -bronzetruck2016 |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{USAJMO newbox|year=2024|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | {{USAJMO newbox|year=2024|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 20:42, 19 July 2024
Contents
Problem
Let be the sequence defined by and for each integer . Suppose that is prime and is a positive integer. Prove that some term of the sequence is divisible by .
Solution 1
Lemma :
Given a prime , a positive integer , and an even such that , we must have that .
Proof of Lemma :
Then,
Therefore, by induction, if there exists an even integer such that , then for all integers , , so we are done if there exists an even such that .
Now, consider the case where there is some prime such that there are no even integers such that .
Lemma :
In this case, we must have that if for all integers .
Proof of Lemma :
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there exists some such that and does not divide . Then, we have , by Fermat's Little Theorem. Since for all , is even, then would be even. However this results in a contradiction.
Then, we get that if , then .
Then, by LTE, . Since , then for all positive integers , so then by Chinese Remainder Theorem there exists integers such that and , so we are done
Remark: I think this is a very cool NT problem.
-bronzetruck2016
See Also
2024 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAJMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.