Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/N1"
(New page: == Problem == Prove that there is no positive integer <math>n</math> such that, for <math>k = 1,2,\ldots,9</math>, the leftmost digit (in decimal notation) of <math>(n + k)!</math> equals ...) |
m (→Solution) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | {{ | + | Suppose that there is such a number <math>n</math>. Let <math>a</math> be the number of digits of <math>(n + 8)!</math>, and let <math>b</math> be the number of digits of <math>n + 9</math>. Then we have: |
+ | |||
+ | <math>8 \cdot 10^{a-1} \leqslant (n + 8)! < 9 \cdot 10^{a-1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | and | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>10^{b-1} \leqslant n + 9 < 10^b</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Combining these inequalities via multiplication we get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>8 \cdot 10^{a+b-2} \leqslant (n+9)! < 9 \cdot 10^{a+b-1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | From this inequality, it can be seen that <math>(n+9)!</math> has at least <math>a+b-1</math> and at most <math>a+b</math> digits. However, if it has <math>a+b</math> digits then the first digit is less than <math>9</math>, which contradicts with how <math>n</math> is defined. Thus, <math>(n+9)!</math> must have <math>a+b-1</math> digits. Expressing this as an inequality, we get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>9 \cdot 10^{a+b-2} \leqslant (n+9)! < 10^{a+b-1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Combining these values with the earlier bounds for <math>(n+8)!</math> via division, we get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>10^{b-1} < n+9 < \frac{5}4 10^{b - 1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suppose that <math>n+1 < 10^{b-1}</math>. Then <math>10^{b-1}</math> is between <math>n+1</math> and <math>n+9</math>. Thus, one of the values <math>n+2,n+2,\ldots n+8</math> must be <math>10^{b-1}</math>. Call that value <math>n+l (1 < l < 9)</math>. This means that the digits of <math>(n+l)!</math> are just the digits of <math>(n+l-1)!</math>, followed by <math>b-1</math> zeroes. Thus the first digit of the two numbers are equal, which contradicts with how <math>n</math> is defined. | ||
+ | This means that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>10^{b-1} \leqslant n+1 < n+2 < n+3 < n+4 < n+9 < \frac{5}4 10^{b - 1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>c</math> be the number of digits of <math>(n+1)!</math>. Then we have: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>10^{c-1} \leqslant (n+1)! < 2 \cdot 10^{c-1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Combining these with the bounds for <math>n+2</math>, <math>n+3</math> and <math>n+4</math> via multiplication we get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>10^{c+3b-4} \leqslant (n+4)! < \frac{125}{32}10^{c+3b-4} < 4 \cdot 10^{c+3b-4}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | So <math>(n + 4)!</math> has <math>c+3b-3</math> digits, but is smaller than the smallest <math>c+3b-3</math> digit number with the first digit 4, which means that its first digit can't be 4. This contradicts with how <math>n</math> is defined, thus no such value of <math>n</math> exists. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Circling | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == |
Latest revision as of 07:14, 1 April 2022
Problem
Prove that there is no positive integer such that, for , the leftmost digit (in decimal notation) of equals .
Solution
Suppose that there is such a number . Let be the number of digits of , and let be the number of digits of . Then we have:
and
Combining these inequalities via multiplication we get:
From this inequality, it can be seen that has at least and at most digits. However, if it has digits then the first digit is less than , which contradicts with how is defined. Thus, must have digits. Expressing this as an inequality, we get:
Combining these values with the earlier bounds for via division, we get:
Suppose that . Then is between and . Thus, one of the values must be . Call that value . This means that the digits of are just the digits of , followed by zeroes. Thus the first digit of the two numbers are equal, which contradicts with how is defined. This means that:
Let be the number of digits of . Then we have:
Combining these with the bounds for , and via multiplication we get:
So has digits, but is smaller than the smallest digit number with the first digit 4, which means that its first digit can't be 4. This contradicts with how is defined, thus no such value of exists.
~Circling