Difference between revisions of "Talk:2008 IMO Problems/Problem 4"

(New page: There are many interesting properties fo <math>f</math> on can prove. The most interesting is probably <cmath> f(xy) = f(x)f(y)\ \forall_{x,y \in \mathbb{R}^+}</cmath> So f must be an au...)
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There are many interesting properties fo <math>f</math> on can prove. The most interesting is probably
+
There are many interesting properties of <math>f</math> one can prove. The most interesting could be
  
 
<cmath> f(xy) = f(x)f(y)\ \forall_{x,y \in \mathbb{R}^+}</cmath>
 
<cmath> f(xy) = f(x)f(y)\ \forall_{x,y \in \mathbb{R}^+}</cmath>

Latest revision as of 10:25, 23 August 2008

There are many interesting properties of $f$ one can prove. The most interesting could be

\[f(xy) = f(x)f(y)\ \forall_{x,y \in \mathbb{R}^+}\]

So f must be an automorphism of the group $\mathbb{R}^+, \times$.

If you assume (or can prove) that f must be continuous, then $f$ must be of the form $f(x) = x^a$ for $a\ne 0$. (the only continuous automorphisms of the group)

Plugging this into the original functional equation gives $a=\pm 1$.

I would like to see an alternative solution along these lines.