Difference between revisions of "Schonemann's criterion"
Silversheep (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'For a polynomial q denote by <math>q^*</math> the residue of <math>q</math> modulo <math>p</math>. Suppose the following conditions hold: <list> <it> <math>k=f^n+pg</math> with <…') |
m (latex \deg) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | If <math>f(x)\in \mathbb{Z}[x]</math> | |
− | + | * <math>f(x)</math> is monic | |
− | < | + | * <math>g(x), h(x)\in \mathbb{Z}[x]</math>, a prime <math>p</math> and an integer <math>n</math> such that <math>f(x)=g(x)^n+ph(x)</math> |
− | < | + | * <math>g(x) \pmod{p}</math> is a irreducible polynomial in <math>\mathbb{F}_p</math> and does not divide <math>h(x) \pmod{p}</math> |
− | < | + | then <math>f(x)</math> is irreducible. |
− | + | ||
− | + | ==Proof== | |
− | < | + | We know that <math>f(x)</math> is monic, so <math>\deg f=n\deg g</math> and we may assume that <math>g(x)</math> is monic. Assume <math>f(x)=p(x)q(x)</math>, where <math>p(x), q(x)\in \mathbb{Z}[x]</math>. Since <math>f(x)=p(x)q(x) \pmod{p}</math>, we get <math>\overline{F}=f(x) \pmod{p}</math>, so <math>g(x)^n \pmod{p}=\overline{P}\cdot \overline{Q}</math>. Therefore, we have <math>p(x)=g(x)^r+pP_1(x)</math> and <math>q(x)=g(x)^{n-r}+pQ_1(x)</math> for some <math>P_1(x)</math> and <math>Q_1(x)</math>. Therefore, |
− | < | + | <cmath>g(x)^n+ph(x)=f(x)=p(x)q(x)=g(x)^n+p(P_1(x)g(x)^{n-r}+Q_1(x)g(x)^r+pP_1(x)Q_1(x))</cmath> |
− | + | This means that <math>h(x)=P_1(x)g(x)^{n-r}+Q_1(x)g(x)^r+pP_1(x)Q_1(x)</math>, which means that <math>g(x)\pmod{p}\vert h(x)\pmod{p}</math>, a contradiction. This means that <math>f(x)</math> is irreducible. | |
+ | |||
+ | {{stub}} | ||
See also [[Eisenstein's criterion]]. | See also [[Eisenstein's criterion]]. |
Latest revision as of 16:03, 31 October 2023
If
- is monic
- , a prime and an integer such that
- is a irreducible polynomial in and does not divide
then is irreducible.
Proof
We know that is monic, so and we may assume that is monic. Assume , where . Since , we get , so . Therefore, we have and for some and . Therefore, This means that , which means that , a contradiction. This means that is irreducible.
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.
See also Eisenstein's criterion.