Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/C2"
(Put up a solution) |
m (minor phraseology tweaking) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | We shall prove this by contradiction. Assume that for some <math>n</math>-tuple of <math>c_i</math> there does not exist two permutations <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> of <math>\{ 1, 2, \ldots,n\}</math> such that <math>n!|S(a)-S(b)</math>. Note that there are <math>n!</math> distinct permutations of <math> | + | We shall prove this by contradiction. Assume that for some <math>n</math>-tuple of <math>c_i</math> there does not exist two permutations <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> of <math>s_n=\{ 1, 2, \ldots,n\}</math> such that <math>n!|S(a)-S(b)</math>. Note that there are <math>n!</math> distinct permutations of <math>s_n</math>, which means there are <math>n!</math> distinct sums <math>S(a)</math>. Because no two of them are congruent modulo <math>n!</math>, we have that for some <math>n</math>-tuple of <math>c_i</math> there exists a unique permutation <math>x</math> of <math>s_n</math> such that <math>S(x)\equiv y\bmod{n}</math> for all integers <math>0\leq y\leq n-1</math>. This means that the sum of every <math>S(a)</math> is congruent to <math>\sum_{i=0}^{n!-1}=\frac{(n!-1)n!}{2}</math>. However, that same sum is congruent to |
<cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(c_i\sum_{j=1}^{n} (n-1)!*a_j\right)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i\cdot \frac{n(n+1)(n-1)!}{2}=\frac{c_i(n+1)!}{2}\bmod{n!}</cmath> | <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(c_i\sum_{j=1}^{n} (n-1)!*a_j\right)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i\cdot \frac{n(n+1)(n-1)!}{2}=\frac{c_i(n+1)!}{2}\bmod{n!}</cmath> |
Latest revision as of 07:55, 31 August 2011
Problem
Let be an odd integer greater than 1 and let be integers. For each permutation of , define . Prove that there exist permutations of such that is a divisor of .
Solution
We shall prove this by contradiction. Assume that for some -tuple of there does not exist two permutations and of such that . Note that there are distinct permutations of , which means there are distinct sums . Because no two of them are congruent modulo , we have that for some -tuple of there exists a unique permutation of such that for all integers . This means that the sum of every is congruent to . However, that same sum is congruent to
Note that , so , so divides the sum. However, the sum is also congruent to modulo , and is odd, so couldn't possibly divide the sum. This leads to a contradiction, so our previous assumption must be false. This proves the problem statement.