Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ceva's Theorem"

m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
The planetmath proof MUST BE REWRITTEN!  AoPS is NOT accepting the viral GNU documentation license.  Please rewrite this proof in your own words.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 17:15, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
 
The planetmath proof MUST BE REWRITTEN!  AoPS is NOT accepting the viral GNU documentation license.  Please rewrite this proof in your own words.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 17:15, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
What happened to the image Billy? --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 10:15, 18 August 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Nevermind, I added my own image and rewrote the proof.  Hm, I just realized that I left out the 'sufficient' part of the 'necessary and sufficient'.... --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 11:08, 18 August 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Eh, I'll finish the trig formulation proof later.  Getting annoyed at the TeX right now. --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 09:27, 22 December 2006 (EST)

Latest revision as of 09:27, 22 December 2006

Feel free to edit or upload as you see fit [billydorminy.homelinux.com/aopswiki/cevathm.png]. --solafidefarms 16:04, 23 June 2006 (EDT)

It would be nicer if the image were cropped, but it's good to see images popping up in the AoPSWiki!--MCrawford 17:14, 23 June 2006 (EDT)

The planetmath proof MUST BE REWRITTEN! AoPS is NOT accepting the viral GNU documentation license. Please rewrite this proof in your own words.--MCrawford 17:15, 23 June 2006 (EDT)

What happened to the image Billy? --Joe 10:15, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

Nevermind, I added my own image and rewrote the proof. Hm, I just realized that I left out the 'sufficient' part of the 'necessary and sufficient'.... --Joe 11:08, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

Eh, I'll finish the trig formulation proof later. Getting annoyed at the TeX right now. --Joe 09:27, 22 December 2006 (EST)