Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combinatorial identity"
(This and Pascal's Triangle) |
Enderramsby (talk | contribs) (→Adding Pascal's Identity) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wait is it Combinatorial or Combinatorical? --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 16:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | Wait is it Combinatorial or Combinatorical? --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 16:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Combinatorial --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
== This and Pascal's Triangle == | == This and Pascal's Triangle == | ||
I'm not quite sure how to work this page and [[Pascal's Triangle]]; I've got a couple of these identites expanded in detail on that page, and they really belong here as well. How much overlap between these pages do we want? --[[User:Dschafer|Dschafer]] 23:36, 24 June 2006 (EDT) | I'm not quite sure how to work this page and [[Pascal's Triangle]]; I've got a couple of these identites expanded in detail on that page, and they really belong here as well. How much overlap between these pages do we want? --[[User:Dschafer|Dschafer]] 23:36, 24 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | When in doubt, put them in both places. If we feel that they don't belong in one place, we can delete them, and then they won't be entirely gone. (Not that they would anyway, but most of us probably don't want to dig through page histories any more than necessary.) --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest deleting this article, and adding a redirect to [[Pascal's Triangle]]. What do you guys think? --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 13:04, 27 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would disagree; while there is some overlap that needs addressing, there is certainly material that belongs here that wouldn't work in Pascal's Triangle, and vice versa. --[[User:Dschafer|Dschafer]] 23:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Adding Pascal's Identity == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I believe that Pascal's Identity should be included here too, so I copy and pasted the Pascal's Identity page into here. I suggest deleting the Pascal's Identity page, what do you guys think? ~enderramsby | ||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 6 March 2023
Wait is it Combinatorial or Combinatorical? --Chess64 16:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
Combinatorial --ComplexZeta 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
This and Pascal's Triangle
I'm not quite sure how to work this page and Pascal's Triangle; I've got a couple of these identites expanded in detail on that page, and they really belong here as well. How much overlap between these pages do we want? --Dschafer 23:36, 24 June 2006 (EDT)
When in doubt, put them in both places. If we feel that they don't belong in one place, we can delete them, and then they won't be entirely gone. (Not that they would anyway, but most of us probably don't want to dig through page histories any more than necessary.) --ComplexZeta 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
I suggest deleting this article, and adding a redirect to Pascal's Triangle. What do you guys think? --Sean 13:04, 27 June 2006 (EDT)
I would disagree; while there is some overlap that needs addressing, there is certainly material that belongs here that wouldn't work in Pascal's Triangle, and vice versa. --Dschafer 23:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
Adding Pascal's Identity
I believe that Pascal's Identity should be included here too, so I copy and pasted the Pascal's Identity page into here. I suggest deleting the Pascal's Identity page, what do you guys think? ~enderramsby
