Difference between revisions of "1977 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
Chess12500 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 3) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problem == | == Problem == | ||
Determine all pairs of positive integers <math> (m,n)</math> such that | Determine all pairs of positive integers <math> (m,n)</math> such that | ||
− | <math> (1 | + | <math> (1+x^n+x^{2n}+\cdots+x^{mn})</math> is divisible by <math> (1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{m})</math>. |
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1 == |
− | Denote the first and larger polynomial to be <math>f(x)</math> and the second one to be <math>g(x)</math>. In order for <math>f(x)</math> to be divisible by <math>g(x)</math> they must have the same roots. The roots of <math>g(x)</math> are the | + | Denote the first and larger polynomial to be <math>f(x)</math> and the second one to be <math>g(x)</math>. In order for <math>f(x)</math> to be divisible by <math>g(x)</math> they must have the same roots. The roots of <math>g(x)</math> are the (m+1)th roots of unity, except for 1. When plugging into <math>f(x)</math>, the root of unity is a root of <math>f(x)</math> if and only if the terms <math>x^n, x^{2n}, x^{3n}, \cdots x^{mn}</math> all represent a different (m+1)th root of unity not equal to 1. |
− | Note that if <math>\\gcd(m,n)=1</math>, the numbers <math>n, 2n, 3n, \cdots, mn</math> represent a complete set of residues modulo <math>m</math>. Therefore, <math>f(x)</math> divides <math>g(x)</math> only if <math>\boxed{\\gcd(m,n)=1}</math> <math>\blacksquare</math> | + | Note that if <math>\\gcd(m+1,n)=1</math>, the numbers <math>n, 2n, 3n, \cdots, mn</math> represent a complete set of residues minus 0 modulo <math>m+1</math>. However, if <math>gcd(m+1,n)=a</math> not equal to 1, then <math>\frac{(m+1)(n)}{a}</math> is congruent to <math>0 \pmod {m+1}</math> and thus a complete set is not formed. Therefore, <math>f(x)</math> divides <math>g(x)</math> if and only if <math>\boxed{\\gcd(m+1,n)=1}.</math> <math>\blacksquare</math> |
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We could instead consider <math>f(x)</math> modulo <math>g(x)</math>. Notice that <math>x^{m+1} = 1 \pmod {g(x)}</math>, and thus we can reduce the exponents of <math>f(x)</math> to their equivalent modulo <math>m+1</math>. We want the resulting <math>h(x)</math> with degree less than <math>m+1</math> to be equal to <math>g(x)</math> (of degree <math>m</math>), which implies that the exponents of <math>f(x)</math> must be all different modulo <math>m+1</math>. This can only occur if and only if <math>gcd(m+1, n) = 1</math>, and this is our answer, as shown in Solution 1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that <math>1+x^n+x^{2n}+...+x^{mn}=\frac{x^{mn+n}-1}{x^n-1}</math> and <math>1+x+x^2+...+x^m=\frac{x^{m+1}-1}{x-1}</math>, so it remains to prove that <math>(x^n-1)(x^{m+1}-1) \mid (x^{mn+n}-1)(x-1)</math>. It is clear that <math>(x^n-1) \mid (x^{mn+n}-1)</math> and <math>(x^{m+1}-1) \mid (x^{mn+n}-1)</math>. For any <math>k \in \mathbb{N}</math>, we can use the fact that <math>x^k-1=\prod_{d \mid k} \Phi _d(x)</math>, where <math>\Phi _d(x)</math> is the dth cyclotomic polynomial. If <math>\gcd(m+1,n) = d > 1</math>, then <math>x^{m+1}-1</math> and <math>x^n-1</math> share a common cyclotomic polynomial; namely, <math>\Phi _d(x)</math>. But since all the factors of <math>x^{mn+n}-1</math> are distinct, <math>(x^{mn+n}-1)(x-1)</math> cannot be divisible by <math>(x^n-1)(x^{m+1}-1)</math>. We find that <math>\gcd(m+1,n) = 1</math> must be the solution, since the only shared polynomial is <math>\Phi _1(x)=x-1</math>, and we are done. | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == |
Latest revision as of 14:58, 23 June 2022
Problem
Determine all pairs of positive integers such that is divisible by .
Solution 1
Denote the first and larger polynomial to be and the second one to be . In order for to be divisible by they must have the same roots. The roots of are the (m+1)th roots of unity, except for 1. When plugging into , the root of unity is a root of if and only if the terms all represent a different (m+1)th root of unity not equal to 1.
Note that if , the numbers represent a complete set of residues minus 0 modulo . However, if not equal to 1, then is congruent to and thus a complete set is not formed. Therefore, divides if and only if
Solution 2
We could instead consider modulo . Notice that , and thus we can reduce the exponents of to their equivalent modulo . We want the resulting with degree less than to be equal to (of degree ), which implies that the exponents of must be all different modulo . This can only occur if and only if , and this is our answer, as shown in Solution 1.
Solution 3
Notice that and , so it remains to prove that . It is clear that and . For any , we can use the fact that , where is the dth cyclotomic polynomial. If , then and share a common cyclotomic polynomial; namely, . But since all the factors of are distinct, cannot be divisible by . We find that must be the solution, since the only shared polynomial is , and we are done.
See Also
1977 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by First Question |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.