Difference between revisions of "1999 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution 2) |
m |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Prove that <math>\max(a_{1}, a_{2}, \dots, | Prove that <math>\max(a_{1}, a_{2}, \dots, | ||
a_{n}) \geq 2</math>. | a_{n}) \geq 2</math>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
+ | === Solution 1 === | ||
First, suppose all the <math>a_i</math> are positive. Then | First, suppose all the <math>a_i</math> are positive. Then | ||
<cmath> \max(a_1, \dotsc, a_n) \ge \sqrt{\frac{a_1^2 + | <cmath> \max(a_1, \dotsc, a_n) \ge \sqrt{\frac{a_1^2 + | ||
Line 23: | Line 20: | ||
<cmath> \sum_{i=k+1}^n -a_i \le 2k-n . </cmath> | <cmath> \sum_{i=k+1}^n -a_i \le 2k-n . </cmath> | ||
Since <math>-a_i</math> is a positive real for all <math>k+1 \le i \le n</math>, it follows that | Since <math>-a_i</math> is a positive real for all <math>k+1 \le i \le n</math>, it follows that | ||
− | <cmath> \sum_{i=k+1}^n a_i^2 \le \left( \sum_{i=k+1}^n | + | <cmath> \sum_{i=k+1}^n a_i^2 \le \left( \sum_{i=k+1}^n-a_i \right)^2 \le (2k-n)^2 . </cmath> |
Then | Then | ||
<cmath> \begin{align*} | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
Since <math>k<n</math>, <math>4(n-k) > 4</math>. It follows that <math>\max(a_1, \dotsc, a_n) \ge \sqrt{4} = 2</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | Since <math>k<n</math>, <math>4(n-k) > 4</math>. It follows that <math>\max(a_1, \dotsc, a_n) \ge \sqrt{4} = 2</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
− | ==Solution 2== | + | ===Solution 2=== |
Assume the contrary and suppose each <math>a_i</math> is less than 2. | Assume the contrary and suppose each <math>a_i</math> is less than 2. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:47, 20 July 2016
Problem
Let () be real numbers such that Prove that .
Solution
Solution 1
First, suppose all the are positive. Then Suppose, on the other hand, that without loss of generality, with . If we are done, so suppose that . Then , so Since is a positive real for all , it follows that Then Since , . It follows that , as desired.
Solution 2
Assume the contrary and suppose each is less than 2.
Without loss of generality let , and let be the largest integer such that and if it exists, or 0 if all the are non-negative. If , then (as ) , a contradiction. Hence, assume . Then Because for , both sides of the inequality are non-positive, so squaring flips the sign. But we also know that for , so which results in a contradiction to our given condition. The proof is complete.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1999 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.