Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elementary symmetric sum"

m (moved)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Are these really the symmetric sums? I am used to calling these the elementary symmetric sums so that symmetric sums are any sums that are symmetric. The point is that any symmetric sum can be written as a polynomial in the elementary symmetric sums. --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 14:53, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
 
Are these really the symmetric sums? I am used to calling these the elementary symmetric sums so that symmetric sums are any sums that are symmetric. The point is that any symmetric sum can be written as a polynomial in the elementary symmetric sums. --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 14:53, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
  
ComplexZeta has an excellent point -- what should we do about that?  Also, why aren't my $ rendering as <math> like they're supposed to?  --~~~~</math>
+
ComplexZeta has an excellent point -- what should we do about that?  Also, why aren't my $ rendering as < math > like they're supposed to?  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 14:14, 24 July 2006 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:Moved. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 19:24, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 19:24, 23 November 2007

Are these really the symmetric sums? I am used to calling these the elementary symmetric sums so that symmetric sums are any sums that are symmetric. The point is that any symmetric sum can be written as a polynomial in the elementary symmetric sums. --ComplexZeta 14:53, 3 July 2006 (EDT)

ComplexZeta has an excellent point -- what should we do about that? Also, why aren't my $ rendering as < math > like they're supposed to? --JBL 14:14, 24 July 2006 (EDT)

Moved. Azjps (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2007 (EST)