Difference between revisions of "1989 AIME Problems/Problem 1"
Lilcritters (talk | contribs) (→Solution 6) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 3 (Symmetry with Generalization)) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Compute <math>\sqrt{(31)(30)(29)(28)+1}</math>. | Compute <math>\sqrt{(31)(30)(29)(28)+1}</math>. | ||
− | + | == Solution 1 (Symmetry)== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Note that the four numbers to multiply are symmetric with the center at <math>29.5</math>. | Note that the four numbers to multiply are symmetric with the center at <math>29.5</math>. | ||
Multiply the symmetric pairs to get <math>31\cdot 28=868</math> and <math>30\cdot 29=870</math>. | Multiply the symmetric pairs to get <math>31\cdot 28=868</math> and <math>30\cdot 29=870</math>. | ||
<math>\sqrt{868\cdot 870 + 1} = \sqrt{(869-1)(869+1) + 1} = \sqrt{869^2 - 1^2 + 1} = \sqrt{869^2} = \boxed{869}</math>. | <math>\sqrt{868\cdot 870 + 1} = \sqrt{(869-1)(869+1) + 1} = \sqrt{869^2 - 1^2 + 1} = \sqrt{869^2} = \boxed{869}</math>. | ||
− | + | == Solution 2 (Symmetry)== | |
− | + | Notice that <math>(a+1)^2 = a \cdot (a+2) +1</math>. Then we can notice that <math>30 \cdot 29 =870 </math> and that <math>31 \cdot 28 = 868</math>. Therefore, <math> \sqrt{(31)(30)(29)(28) +1} = \sqrt{(870)(868) +1} = \sqrt{(868 +1)^2} = \boxed{869}</math>. This is because we have that <math>a=868</math> as per the equation <math>(a+1)^2 = a \cdot (a+2) +1</math>. | |
+ | |||
+ | ~qwertysri987 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 3 (Symmetry with Generalization) == | ||
+ | More generally, we can prove that one more than the product of four consecutive integers must be a perfect square: | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | (a+3)(a+2)(a+1)(a)+1 &= [(a+3)(a)][(a+2)(a+1)]+1 \\ | ||
+ | &= [a^2+3a][a^2+3a+2]+1 \\ | ||
+ | &= [a^2+3a]^2+2[a^2+3a]+1 \\ | ||
+ | &= [a^2+3a+1]^2. | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | At <math>a=28,</math> we have <cmath>\sqrt{(a+3)(a+2)(a+1)(a)+1}=a^2+3a+1=\boxed{869}.</cmath> | ||
+ | ~Novus677 (Fundamental Logic) | ||
− | + | ~MRENTHUSIASM (Reconstruction) | |
− | + | == Solution 4 (Symmetry with Generalization) == | |
Similar to Solution 1 above, call the consecutive integers <math>\left(n-\frac{3}{2}\right), \left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right), \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right), \left(n+\frac{3}{2}\right)</math> to make use of symmetry. Note that <math>n</math> itself is not an integer - in this case, <math>n = 29.5</math>. The expression becomes <math>\sqrt{\left(n-\frac{3}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{3}{2}\right)\left(n - \frac{1}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) + 1}</math>. Distributing each pair of difference of squares first, and then distributing the two resulting quadratics and adding the constant, gives <math>\sqrt{n^4 - \frac{5}{2}n^2 + \frac{25}{16}}</math>. The inside is a perfect square trinomial, since <math>b^2 = 4ac</math>. It's equal to <math>\sqrt{\left(n^2 - \frac{5}{4}\right)^2}</math>, which simplifies to <math>n^2 - \frac{5}{4}</math>. You can plug in the value of <math>n</math> from there, or further simplify to <math>\left(n - \frac{1}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) - 1</math>, which is easier to compute. Either way, plugging in <math>n=29.5</math> gives <math>\boxed{869}</math>. | Similar to Solution 1 above, call the consecutive integers <math>\left(n-\frac{3}{2}\right), \left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right), \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right), \left(n+\frac{3}{2}\right)</math> to make use of symmetry. Note that <math>n</math> itself is not an integer - in this case, <math>n = 29.5</math>. The expression becomes <math>\sqrt{\left(n-\frac{3}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{3}{2}\right)\left(n - \frac{1}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) + 1}</math>. Distributing each pair of difference of squares first, and then distributing the two resulting quadratics and adding the constant, gives <math>\sqrt{n^4 - \frac{5}{2}n^2 + \frac{25}{16}}</math>. The inside is a perfect square trinomial, since <math>b^2 = 4ac</math>. It's equal to <math>\sqrt{\left(n^2 - \frac{5}{4}\right)^2}</math>, which simplifies to <math>n^2 - \frac{5}{4}</math>. You can plug in the value of <math>n</math> from there, or further simplify to <math>\left(n - \frac{1}{2}\right)\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) - 1</math>, which is easier to compute. Either way, plugging in <math>n=29.5</math> gives <math>\boxed{869}</math>. | ||
− | ==Solution 5== | + | == Solution 5 (Prime Factorization) == |
− | + | We have <math>(31)(30)(29)(28)+1=755161.</math> Since the alternating sum of the digits <math>7-5+5-1+6-1=11</math> is divisible by <math>11,</math> we conclude that <math>755161</math> is divisible by <math>11.</math> | |
− | + | ||
+ | We evaluate the original expression by prime factorization: | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \sqrt{(31)(30)(29)(28)+1}&=\sqrt{755161} \\ | ||
+ | &=\sqrt{11\cdot68651} \\ | ||
+ | &=\sqrt{11^2\cdot6241} \\ | ||
+ | &=\sqrt{11^2\cdot79^2} \\ | ||
+ | &=11\cdot79 \\ | ||
+ | &=\boxed{869}. | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | ~Vrjmath (Fundamental Logic) | ||
− | + | ~MRENTHUSIASM (Reconstruction) | |
− | + | ||
+ | == Solution 6 (Observation) == | ||
+ | The last digit under the radical is <math>1</math>, so the square root must either end in <math>1</math> or <math>9</math>, since <math>x^2 = 1\pmod {10}</math> means <math>x = \pm 1</math>. Additionally, the number must be near <math>29 \cdot 30 = 870</math>, narrowing the reasonable choices to <math>869</math> and <math>871</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Continuing the logic, the next-to-last digit under the radical is the same as the last digit of <math>28 \cdot 29 \cdot 3 \cdot 31</math>, which is <math>6</math>. Quick computation shows that <math>869^2</math> ends in <math>61</math>, while <math>871^2</math> ends in <math>41</math>. Thus, the answer is <math>\boxed{869}</math>. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Latest revision as of 23:12, 7 October 2021
Contents
Problem
Compute .
Solution 1 (Symmetry)
Note that the four numbers to multiply are symmetric with the center at . Multiply the symmetric pairs to get and . .
Solution 2 (Symmetry)
Notice that . Then we can notice that and that . Therefore, . This is because we have that as per the equation .
~qwertysri987
Solution 3 (Symmetry with Generalization)
More generally, we can prove that one more than the product of four consecutive integers must be a perfect square: At we have ~Novus677 (Fundamental Logic)
~MRENTHUSIASM (Reconstruction)
Solution 4 (Symmetry with Generalization)
Similar to Solution 1 above, call the consecutive integers to make use of symmetry. Note that itself is not an integer - in this case, . The expression becomes . Distributing each pair of difference of squares first, and then distributing the two resulting quadratics and adding the constant, gives . The inside is a perfect square trinomial, since . It's equal to , which simplifies to . You can plug in the value of from there, or further simplify to , which is easier to compute. Either way, plugging in gives .
Solution 5 (Prime Factorization)
We have Since the alternating sum of the digits is divisible by we conclude that is divisible by
We evaluate the original expression by prime factorization: ~Vrjmath (Fundamental Logic)
~MRENTHUSIASM (Reconstruction)
Solution 6 (Observation)
The last digit under the radical is , so the square root must either end in or , since means . Additionally, the number must be near , narrowing the reasonable choices to and .
Continuing the logic, the next-to-last digit under the radical is the same as the last digit of , which is . Quick computation shows that ends in , while ends in . Thus, the answer is .
See also
1989 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by First Question |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.