Difference between revisions of "Slalom conjuncture"
Elbertpark (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors. | Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors. | ||
<h1>Proof</h1> | <h1>Proof</h1> | ||
| − | Unfortunately, only Doggo and | + | Unfortunately, only Doggo and [redacted] have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture. |
<h2>Broken proof</h2> | <h2>Broken proof</h2> | ||
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet. | For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet. | ||
<code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code> | <code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code> | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 15 June 2021
Contents
The Slalom Conjuncture
As discovered by Elbertpark
Written by Elbertpark
Idea made by Elbertpark...
and so on
What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?
The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square 
, then this square has a maximum of 
factors starting from 3.
Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.
| Number | |
# of factors |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 9 | 3 |
| 5 | 25 | 3 |
| 7 | 49 | 3 |
| 9 | 81 | 5 |
| 11 | 121 | 3 |
| ... | ... | ... |
| 81 | 6561 | 9 |
| 4001 | 16008001 | 3 |
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
Proof
Unfortunately, only Doggo and [redacted] have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.
Broken proof
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.
This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.
