Difference between revisions of "2021 Fall AMC 10A Problems/Problem 25"
(→Solution 2 (Factored form)) |
(→Solution 1) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Solution 1== | == Solution 1== | ||
− | Let <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_2</math> be the roots of <math>\tilde{p}(x)</math>. Then, <math>\tilde{p}(x)=(x-r_1)(x-r_2)=x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+r_1r_2</math>. The solutions to <math>\tilde{p}(\tilde{p}(x))=0</math> is the union of the solutions to <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_1)=0</math> and <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_2)=0</math>. It follows that one of these two quadratics has one solution (a double root) and the other has two. WLOG, assume that the quadratic with one root is <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_1)=0</math>. Then, the discriminant is <math>0</math>, so <math>(r_1+r_2)^2 = 4r_1r_2 - 4r_1</math>. Thus, <math>r_1-r_2=\pm 2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>, but for <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_2)=0</math> to have two solutions, it must be the case that <math>r_1-r_2=- 2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>. | + | Let <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_2</math> be the roots of <math>\tilde{p}(x)</math>. Then, <math>\tilde{p}(x)=(x-r_1)(x-r_2)=x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+r_1r_2</math>. The solutions to <math>\tilde{p}(\tilde{p}(x))=0</math> is the union of the solutions to <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_1)=0</math> and <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_2)=0</math>. It follows that one of these two quadratics has one solution (a double root) and the other has two. WLOG, assume that the quadratic with one root is <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_1)=0</math>. Then, the discriminant is <math>0</math>, so <math>(r_1+r_2)^2 = 4r_1r_2 - 4r_1</math>. Thus, <math>r_1-r_2=\pm 2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>, but for <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_2)=0</math> to have two solutions, it must be the case that <math>r_1-r_2=- 2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>*. It follows that the sum of the roots of <math>\tilde{p}(x)</math> is <math>2r_1 + 2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>, whose maximum value occurs when <math>r_1 = - \frac{1}{4}</math>. Solving for <math>r_2</math> yields <math>r_2 = \frac{3}{4}</math>. Therefore, <math>\tilde{p}(x)=x^2 - \frac{1}{2} x - \frac{3}{16}</math>, so <math>\tilde{p}(1)= \boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{5}{16}}</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | <math>*</math> For <math>x^2-(r_1+r_2)x+(r_1r_2-r_2)=0</math> to have two solutions, the discriminant <math>(r_1+r_2)^2-4r_1r_2+4r_2</math> must be positive. From here, we get that <math>(r_1-r_2)^2>-4r_2</math>, so <math>-4r_1>-4r_2 \rightarrow r_1<r_2</math>. Hence, <math>r_1-r_2</math> is negative, so <math>r_1-r_2=2\sqrt{-r_1}</math>. | ||
~ Leo.Euler | ~ Leo.Euler |
Revision as of 21:02, 22 November 2021
Problem
A quadratic polynomial with real coefficients and leading coefficient is called if the equation is satisfied by exactly three real numbers. Among all the disrespectful quadratic polynomials, there is a unique such polynomial for which the sum of the roots is maximized. What is ?
Solution 1
Let and be the roots of . Then, . The solutions to is the union of the solutions to and . It follows that one of these two quadratics has one solution (a double root) and the other has two. WLOG, assume that the quadratic with one root is . Then, the discriminant is , so . Thus, , but for to have two solutions, it must be the case that *. It follows that the sum of the roots of is , whose maximum value occurs when . Solving for yields . Therefore, , so .
For to have two solutions, the discriminant must be positive. From here, we get that , so . Hence, is negative, so .
~ Leo.Euler
Solution 2 (Factored form)
The disrespectful function has leading coefficient 1, so it can be written in factored form as . Now the problem states that all must satisfy . Plugging our form in, we get: The roots of this equation are . By the fundamental theorem of algebra, each root must have two roots for a total of four possible values of x yet the problem states that this equation is satisfied by three values of x. Therefore one equation must give a double root. Without loss of generality, let the equation be the equation that produces the double root. Expanding gives . We know that if there is a double root to this equation, the discriminant must be equal to zero, so .
From here two solutions can progress.
Solution 2.1 (Fastest)
We can rewrite as . Let's keep our eyes on the ball; we want to find the disrespectful quadratic that maximizes the sum of the roots, which is . Let this be equal to a new variable, , so that our problem is reduced to maximizing this variable. We can rewrite our equation in terms of m as .
This is a quadratic in m, so we can use the quadratic formula:
Solution in progress
~KingRavi