Difference between revisions of "1964 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Hastapasta (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
Hastapasta (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1.0) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Experimenting with the residue of <math>2^n</math> mod 7: | Experimenting with the residue of <math>2^n</math> mod 7: | ||
− | n=1: 2 | + | <math>n</math>=1: 2 |
− | n=2: 4 | + | <math>n</math>=2: 4 |
− | n=3: 1 (this is because when <math>2^n</math> is doubled to <math>2^(n+1)</math>, the residue doubles too, but <math>4*2</math> is congruent to 1 (mod 7). | + | <math>n</math>=3: 1 (this is because when <math>2^n</math> is doubled to <math>2^(n+1)</math>, the residue doubles too, but <math>4*2</math> is congruent to 1 (mod 7). |
− | n=4: 2 | + | <math>n</math>=4: 2 |
− | n=5: 4 | + | <math>n</math>=5: 4 |
− | n=6: 1 | + | <math>n</math>=6: 1 |
Through induction, we easy show that this is true since the residue doubles every time you double <math>2^n</math>. | Through induction, we easy show that this is true since the residue doubles every time you double <math>2^n</math>. | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
So, the residue of <math>2^n</math> mod 7 cycles in 2, 4, 1. Therefore, <math>n</math> must be a multiple of 3. Proved. | So, the residue of <math>2^n</math> mod 7 cycles in 2, 4, 1. Therefore, <math>n</math> must be a multiple of 3. Proved. | ||
− | (2) According to part (1), the residue of <math>2^n</math> cycles in 2, 4, 1. If <math>2^ | + | (2) According to part (1), the residue of <math>2^n</math> cycles in 2, 4, 1. If <math>2*2^n</math> is congruent to 0 mod 7, then <math>2^n</math> must be congruent to 6 mod 7, but this is not possible due to how <math>2^n</math> mod 7 cycles. Therefore, there is no solution. Proved. |
~hastapasta | ~hastapasta |
Revision as of 18:43, 7 January 2022
Problem
(a) Find all positive integers for which is divisible by .
(b) Prove that there is no positive integer for which is divisible by .
Solution 1.0
We see that is equivalent to and for congruent to , , and , respectively.
(a) From the statement above, only divisible by work.
(b) Again from the statement above, can never be congruent to , so there are no solutions for .
Solution 1.1:
The solution is clearer and easier to understand.
(1) Since we know that is congruent to 0 (mod 7), we know that is congruent to 8 mod 7, which means is congruent to 1 mod 7.
Experimenting with the residue of mod 7:
=1: 2
=2: 4
=3: 1 (this is because when is doubled to , the residue doubles too, but is congruent to 1 (mod 7).
=4: 2
=5: 4
=6: 1
Through induction, we easy show that this is true since the residue doubles every time you double .
So, the residue of mod 7 cycles in 2, 4, 1. Therefore, must be a multiple of 3. Proved.
(2) According to part (1), the residue of cycles in 2, 4, 1. If is congruent to 0 mod 7, then must be congruent to 6 mod 7, but this is not possible due to how mod 7 cycles. Therefore, there is no solution. Proved.
~hastapasta
See Also
1964 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |