Difference between revisions of "2023 AIME I Problems/Problem 7"
m (→Solution) |
Mathboy100 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unofficial problem statement: Find the number of positive integers from 1 to 1000 that have different mods in mod 2,3,4,5, and 6. | Unofficial problem statement: Find the number of positive integers from 1 to 1000 that have different mods in mod 2,3,4,5, and 6. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
Line 69: | Line 66: | ||
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) | ~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>n</math> can either be <math>0</math> or <math>1</math> mod <math>2</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Case 1: <math>n = 0 \pmod{2}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, <math>n = 2 \pmod{4}</math>, which implies <math>n = 1 \pmod{3}</math>. By CRT, <math>n = 4 \pmod{6}</math>, and therefore <math>n = 3 \pmod{5}</math>. Using CRT again, we obtain <math>n = 58 \pmod{60}</math>, which gives <math>16</math> values for <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Case 2: <math>n = 1 \pmod{2}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>n</math> is then <math>3 \pmod{4}</math>. If <math>n</math> is <math>0 \pmod{3}</math>, then by CRT, <math>n = 3 \pmod{6}</math>, a contradiction. Thus, <math>n = 2 \pmod{3}</math>, which by CRT implies <math>n = 5 \pmod{6}</math>. <math>n</math> can either be <math>0 \pmod 5</math>, which implies that <math>n = 35 \pmod 60</math>, <math>17</math> cases; or <math>4 \pmod 5</math>, which implies that <math>n = 59 \pmod 60</math>, <math>16</math> cases. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>16 + 16 + 17 = \boxed{49}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~mathboy100 |
Revision as of 16:09, 8 February 2023
Unofficial problem statement: Find the number of positive integers from 1 to 1000 that have different mods in mod 2,3,4,5, and 6.
Solution
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies , .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of . Thus, .
However, conflicts . Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of .
Because , we must have . Hence, .
Hence, . Hence, .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this case is 16.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, and are two distinct numbers in . Because and is odd, we have . Hence, or 4.
, , .
We have .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 17.
, , .
.
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 16.
Putting all cases together, the total number of extra-distinct is .
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
Solution 2
can either be or mod .
Case 1:
Then, , which implies . By CRT, , and therefore . Using CRT again, we obtain , which gives values for .
Case 2:
is then . If is , then by CRT, , a contradiction. Thus, , which by CRT implies . can either be , which implies that , cases; or , which implies that , cases.
.
~mathboy100