Difference between revisions of "Complete Quadrilateral"
(→Areas in complete quadrilateral) |
(→Areas in complete quadrilateral) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<i><b>Proof</b></i> | <i><b>Proof</b></i> | ||
− | Let <math>X_1, Y_1, D_1, C_1, Z_1,</math> and <math>F_1</math> be the projections of <math>X, Y, A, B, Z,</math> and <math>E,</math> respectively onto <math>CD.</math> | + | [[File:Complete areas 1.png|400px|right]] |
+ | Let <math>X_1, Y_1, D_1, C_1, Z_1,</math> and <math>F_1</math> be the projections of <math>X, Y, A, B, Z,</math> and <math>E,</math> respectively onto <math>CD.</math> | ||
+ | |||
Let <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> be the circles with diameters <math>AD, BC,</math> and <math>EF,</math> respectively. | Let <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> be the circles with diameters <math>AD, BC,</math> and <math>EF,</math> respectively. | ||
− | < | + | <cmath>\angle EF_1F = 90^\circ \implies F_1 \in \Omega.</cmath> |
+ | Similarly <math>D_1 \in \omega, C_1 \in \theta.</math> | ||
+ | |||
Let common radical axes of <math>\omega, \Omega,</math> and <math>\theta</math> cross <math>CD</math> at point <math>G.</math> | Let common radical axes of <math>\omega, \Omega,</math> and <math>\theta</math> cross <math>CD</math> at point <math>G.</math> | ||
− | < | + | <cmath>EF_1 || AD_1 \implies \frac {EC}{F_1C} = \frac {AC}{D_1C}.</cmath> |
The power of the point <math>G</math> with respect <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> is the same, therefore | The power of the point <math>G</math> with respect <math>\omega, \theta,</math> and <math>\Omega</math> is the same, therefore | ||
− | < | + | <cmath>GF \cdot GF_1 = GC \cdot GC_1 = GD \cdot GD_1 \implies </cmath> |
− | < | + | <cmath>(\vec G - \vec F) \cdot (\vec G - \vec F_1) = (\vec G - \vec C) \cdot (\vec G - \vec C_1) = (\vec G - \vec D) \cdot (\vec G – \vec D_1) \implies </cmath> |
− | <cmath>F \cdot F_1 – G \cdot (F + F_1) = F \cdot F_1 – G \cdot | + | <cmath>\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec F + \vec F_1) = \vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec G \cdot 2\vec Z_1 = \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec C + \vec C_1) =</cmath> |
− | <cmath>= C \cdot C_1 | + | <cmath>= \vec C \cdot \vec C_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec X_1 = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 – \vec G \cdot (\vec D + \vec D_1) = \vec D \cdot \vec D_1 - \vec G \cdot 2\vec Y_1 \implies</cmath> |
− | < | + | <cmath>|\vec G| = \frac {\vec F \cdot\vec F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1}{2|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|} = \frac {\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 – \vec D \cdot \vec D_1}{2|\vec Z_1 – \vec Y_1|} \implies</cmath> |
− | < | + | <cmath>\frac {|\vec Z_1 - \vec X_1|}{|\vec Z_1 - \vec Y_1|} = \frac {\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 - \vec C \cdot \vec C_1} {\vec F \cdot \vec F_1 - \vec D \cdot\vec D_1} = \frac {Z_1X_1}{Z_1Y_1} = \frac {ZX}{ZY} .</cmath> |
− | + | <cmath>\frac {ZX}{ZY} = \frac {FC \cdot F_1C} {DC \cdot D_1C} = \frac {FC \cdot DC} {EC \cdot BC} = \frac {[CEF]}{[CAD]}.</cmath> | |
Therefore <cmath>\frac {[ADEF]}{[ACD]} = \frac {[CEF]-[CAD]}{[CAD]} =\frac {ZX - ZY}{ZY} = \frac {XY}{ZY}.</cmath> | Therefore <cmath>\frac {[ADEF]}{[ACD]} = \frac {[CEF]-[CAD]}{[CAD]} =\frac {ZX - ZY}{ZY} = \frac {XY}{ZY}.</cmath> |
Revision as of 14:57, 5 May 2023
Contents
Complete quadrilateral
Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral. In the diagram these are One can see some of the properties of this configuration and their proof using the following links.
Radical axis
Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral. In the diagram these are
Let points and be the orthocenters of and respectively.
Let circles and be the circles with diameters and respectively. Prove that Steiner line is the radical axis of and
Proof
Let points and be the foots of perpendiculars and respectively.
Denote power of point with respect the circle
Therefore power of point with respect these three circles is the same. These points lies on the common radical axis of and Steiner line is the radical axis as desired.
vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss
Areas in complete quadrilateral
Let complete quadrilateral be given . Let and be the midpoints of and respectively.
Prove that where is the area of
Proof
Let and be the projections of and respectively onto
Let and be the circles with diameters and respectively. Similarly
Let common radical axes of and cross at point The power of the point with respect and is the same, therefore
Therefore
vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss
Newton–Gauss line
Let four lines made four triangles of a complete quadrilateral.
In the diagram these are
Let points and be the midpoints of and respectively.
Let points and be the orthocenters of and respectively.
Prove that Steiner line is perpendicular to Gauss line
Proof
Points and are the centers of circles with diameters and respectively.
Steiner line is the radical axis of these circles.
Therefore as desired.
vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss
Shatunov-Tokarev line
Let the complete quadrilateral ABCDEF be labeled as in the diagram. Quadrilateral is not cyclic.
Let points be the orthocenters and points be the circumcenters of and respectively.
Let bisector cross bisector at point Let bisector cross bisector at point
Prove that
a) points and lie on circumcircle of
b) line is symmetric to Steiner line with respect centroid of
I suppose that this line was found independently by two young mathematicians Leonid Shatunov and Alexander Tokarev in 2022. I would be grateful for information on whether this line was previously known.
Proof
a) Points and lies on bisector of points and lies on bisector of
circle
Similarly circle as desired.
b) Let and be midpoints of and respectively.
It is clear that is centroid of
(midline of trapezium (midline of trapezium is parallelogram.
Similarly one can prove that point the midpoint of is symmetric to with respect
Therefore line coincide with Steiner line and line is symmetric to Steiner line with respect and is parallel to this line.
vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss