Difference between revisions of "1992 OIM Problems/Problem 2"
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Where <math>K_i</math> and <math>P_i</math> are coefficients of the respective polynomials for each <math>x^i</math> | Where <math>K_i</math> and <math>P_i</math> are coefficients of the respective polynomials for each <math>x^i</math> | ||
− | <math> x^n+(0)x^{n | + | <math> x^n+(0)x^{n-1}+\left( K_{n-2}-L_{n-2} \right)x^{n-2}+\cdots+\left( K_{1}-L_{1} \right)x+\left( K_{0}-L_{0} \right)=0</math> |
From properties of polynomials, we know that the sum of the roots of a polynomial of degree n is <math>-b/a</math> where <math>b</math> is the coefficient of <math>x^{n-1}</math> and <math>a</math> is the coefficient of <math>x^n</math> | From properties of polynomials, we know that the sum of the roots of a polynomial of degree n is <math>-b/a</math> where <math>b</math> is the coefficient of <math>x^{n-1}</math> and <math>a</math> is the coefficient of <math>x^n</math> |
Revision as of 13:54, 22 December 2023
Problem
Given the collection of positive real numbers and the function:
Determine the sum of the lengths of the intervals, disjoint two by two, formed by all .
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution
Since , we can plot to visualize what we're looking for:
Notice that the intervals will be:
Thus the sum of the intervals will be:
Now we set :
And solve for zero:
Where and are coefficients of the respective polynomials for each
From properties of polynomials, we know that the sum of the roots of a polynomial of degree n is where is the coefficient of and is the coefficient of
Therefore,
and,
Thus the sum of the intervals is
- Note. I actually competed at this event in Venezuela when I was in High School representing Puerto Rico. I got a ZERO on this one because I didn't even know what was I supposed to do, nor did I know what the sum of the lengths of the intervals, disjoint two by two meant. I didn't even get points for drawing the function. haha. Several decades ago I was able to finally solve it. But even now, I'm still unsure about the "disjunct two by two" wording...
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.