Difference between revisions of "2024 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 23"

(Problem)
(Problem)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
filldraw((1,2)--(2,2)--(2,1)--(1,1)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1));
 
filldraw((1,2)--(2,2)--(2,1)--(1,1)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1));
 
filldraw((1,1)--(2,1)--(2,0)--(1,0)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1));
 
filldraw((1,1)--(2,1)--(2,0)--(1,0)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1));
 
  
 
draw((-1,5)--(-1,-1),gray(.9));
 
draw((-1,5)--(-1,-1),gray(.9));
Line 37: Line 36:
 
draw((-1,0) -- (5,0), arrow=Arrow);
 
draw((-1,0) -- (5,0), arrow=Arrow);
 
draw((0,-1) -- (0,5), arrow=Arrow);
 
draw((0,-1) -- (0,5), arrow=Arrow);
 
filldraw((0,4)--(1,4)--(1,3)--(0,3)--cycle, grey(.8));
 
 
  
 
</asy>
 
</asy>

Revision as of 23:34, 28 January 2024

Problem

Rodrigo has a very large sheet of graph paper. First he draws a line segment connecting point $(0,4)$ to point $(2,0)$ and colors the $4$ cells whose interiors intersect the segment, as shown below. Next Rodrigo draws a line segment connecting point $(2000,3000)$ to point $(5000,8000)$. How many cells will he color this time?

[asy]  filldraw((0,4)--(1,4)--(1,3)--(0,3)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1)); filldraw((0,3)--(1,3)--(1,2)--(0,2)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1)); filldraw((1,2)--(2,2)--(2,1)--(1,1)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1)); filldraw((1,1)--(2,1)--(2,0)--(1,0)--cycle, gray(.75), gray(.5)+linewidth(1));  draw((-1,5)--(-1,-1),gray(.9)); draw((0,5)--(0,-1),gray(.9)); draw((1,5)--(1,-1),gray(.9)); draw((2,5)--(2,-1),gray(.9)); draw((3,5)--(3,-1),gray(.9)); draw((4,5)--(4,-1),gray(.9)); draw((5,5)--(5,-1),gray(.9));  draw((-1,5)--(5, 5),gray(.9)); draw((-1,4)--(5,4),gray(.9)); draw((-1,3)--(5,3),gray(.9)); draw((-1,2)--(5,2),gray(.9)); draw((-1,1)--(5,1),gray(.9)); draw((-1,0)--(5,0),gray(.9)); draw((-1,-1)--(5,-1),gray(.9));   dot((0,4)); label("$(0,4)$",(0,4),NW);  dot((2,0)); label("$(2,0)$",(2,0),SE);  draw((0,4)--(2,0));  draw((-1,0) -- (5,0), arrow=Arrow); draw((0,-1) -- (0,5), arrow=Arrow);  [/asy]

Fast Solution (2 minutes) AND generalized formula by MegaMath

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2m5U6x-_-8

Solution 1

Let $f(x, y)$ be the number of cells the line segment from $(0, 0)$ to $(x, y)$ passes through. The problem is then equivalent to finding \[f(5000-2000, 8000-3000)=f(3000, 5000).\] Sometimes the segment passes through lattice points in between the endpoints, which happens $\text{gcd}(3000, 5000)-1=999$ times. This partitions the segment into $1000$ congruent pieces that each pass through $f(3, 5)$ cells, which means the answer is \[1000f(3, 5).\] Note that a new square is entered when the lines pass through one of the lines in the coordinate grid, which for $f(3, 5)$ happens $3-1+5-1=6$ times. Because $3$ and $5$ are relatively prime, no lattice point except for the endpoints intersects the line segment from $(0, 0)$ to $(3, 5).$ This means that including the first cell closest to $(0, 0),$ The segment passes through $f(3, 5)=6+1=7$ cells. Thus, the answer is $\boxed{7000}.$ Alternatively, $f(3, 5)$ can be found by drawing an accurate diagram, leaving you with the same answer.

~BS2012

Note: A general form for finding $f(x, y)$ is $x+y-\text{gcd}(x, y).$ We subtract $\text{gcd}(x, y)$ to account for overlapping, when the line segment goes through a lattice point.

~mathkiddus

Proof of This Claim

$\textbf{Lemma 1 for Problem 23:}$

Let $p$ and $q$ be relatively prime positive integers. When a $p\times q$ rectangle is split up into $pq$ unit squares, exactly $p + q - 1$ unit squares are crossed by the diagonal of this rectangle.


$\textbf{Proof:}$


First, we claim that the diagonal does not cross the corner of a unit square. \\\\ To prove this claim we proceed by way of contradiction. Plot the rectangle on the Cartesian plane at the vertices $(0,0),(p,0),(q,p),(0,q).$ The diagonal has endpoints at $(0,0),(q,p)$, so its slope is $\frac{p}{q}.$ Now, suppose the diagonal goes through the corner point $(a,b)$, where $a<q$ and $b<p$. The slope of this line is $\frac{b}{a}$, which must be equal to $\frac{p}{q},$ implying that $\frac{p}{q}$ can be reduced, contradicting the fact that $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime. We conclude that no corner points of a grid entry (unit square) are crossed. \\\\ Since no corner points are crossed, each time the diagonal crosses either a horizontal or vertical grid line, exactly one more unit square is touched by the diagonal. There are $p-1$ horizontal lines and $q-1$ vertical lines, so there are $p + q - 2$ total lines crossed by the diagonal. This doesn't include the square in the bottom left corner, crossed initially. Therefore, there are $p + q-2 + 1 = p + q - 1$ unit squares crossed by the diagonal and our claim is proven.

$\textbf{Lemma 2 for Problem 23:}$


Let $p$ and $q$ be positive integers. When a $p\times q$ rectangle is split up into $pq$ units squares, exactly $p + q - \gcd(p, q)$ unit squares are crossed by the diagonal of this rectangle.


If $\gcd (p,q) = 1$, then we are done by Lemma 1.

Suppose $\gcd(p,q) = k>1$, i.e $p = ak$ and $q = bk$, for positive integers $a$ and $b$. We can then split the $p\times q$ rectangle up into $k$ $\frac{p}{k} \times \frac{q}{k}$ rectangles, strung together at the diagonal. An example for $(p,q)=(4,6)$ is shown below, where two $2\times 3$ rectangles are strung together:

[asy] unitsize(1cm); draw((0,0)--(6,4),linewidth(1)); currentpen = linewidth(.5); for (real i = 0; i <= 6; ++i) {     draw((i, 0)--(i, 4)); } for (real i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {     draw((0, i)--(6, i)); }  currentpen = linewidth(1.5); for (real i = 0; i <= 3; ++i) {     draw((i, 0)--(i, 2)); } for (real i = 0; i <= 2; ++i) {     draw((0, i)--(3, i)); }  for (real i = 3; i <= 6; ++i) {     draw((i, 2)--(i, 4)); } for (real i = 3; i <= 5; ++i) {     draw((3, i-1)--(6, i-1)); } [/asy] \\\\ After the diagonal crosses the corner point of a square, the pattern repeats itself with the next one. By Lemma 1, there are $\frac{p}{k}+ \frac{q}{k} - 1$ diagonals crossed in each rectangle. There are $k = \gcd (p, q)$ rectangles, so the number of crossed diagonals in total is \[k\left( \frac{p}{k}+ \frac{q}{k} - 1 \right) = p + q - \gcd(p,q).\]

-Benedict T (countmath1)

Video Solution by Power Solve (crystal clear!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzgWcEz4K_A

Video Solution 1 by Math-X (First fully understand the problem!!!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqqAk-Cd_5M

~Math-X

Video Solution 2 by OmegaLearn.org

https://youtu.be/wNymnFQfN_k

Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Zo7QOB-us

Video Solution by CosineMethod [🔥Fast and Easy🔥]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8zha2ijVQQ

See Also

2024 AMC 8 (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 22
Followed by
Problem 24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png