Difference between revisions of "Combinatorial identity"

Revision as of 08:17, 10 March 2009

Hockey-Stick Identity

For $n,r\in\mathbb{N}, n>r,\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}={n+1\choose r+1}$ .

This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.

An image is supposed to go here. You can help us out by creating one and editing it in. Thanks.

Proof

Inductive Proof

This identity can be proven by induction on $n$ .

Base Case Let $n=r$ .

$\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}=\sum^r_{i=r}{i\choose r}={r\choose r}=1={r+1\choose r+1}$ .

Inductive Step Suppose, for some $k\in\mathbb{N}, k>r$ , $\sum^k_{i=r}{i\choose r}={k+1\choose r+1}$ . Then $\sum^{k+1}_{i=r}{i\choose r}=\left(\sum^k_{i=r}{i\choose r}\right)+{k+1\choose r}={k+1\choose r+1}+{k+1\choose r}={k+2\choose r+1}$ .

Algebraic Proof

It can also be proven algebraically with Pascal's Identity, ${n \choose k}={n-1\choose k-1}+{n-1\choose k}$ . Note that

${r \choose r}+{r+1 \choose r}+{r+2 \choose r}+\cdots+{r+a \choose r}$ $={r+1 \choose r+1}+{r+1 \choose r}+{r+2 \choose r}+\cdots+{r+a \choose r}$ $={r+2 \choose r+1}+{r+2 \choose r}+\cdots+{r+a \choose r}=\cdots={r+a \choose r-1}+{r+a \choose r}={r+a+1 \choose r+1}$ , which is equivalent to the desired result.

Combinatorial Proof

Imagine that we are distributing $n$ indistinguishable candies to $k$ distinguishable children. By a direct application of Balls and Urns, there are ${n+k-1\choose k-1}$ ways to do this. Alternatively, we can first give $0\le i\le n$ candies to the oldest child so that we are essentially giving $n-i$ candies to $k-1$ kids and again, with Balls and Urns, ${n+k-1\choose k-1}=\sum_{i=0}^n{n+k-2-i\choose k-2}$ , which simplifies to the desired result.

Vandermonde's Identity

Vandermonde's Identity states that $\sum_{k=0}^r\binom mk\binom n{r-k}=\binom{m+n}r$ , which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of $r$ objects from a group of $m+n$ objects must have some $0\le k\le r$ objects from group $m$ and the remaining from group $n$ .

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 == Examples ==
+* [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=394407#394407 1986 AIME Problem 15]
-* [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/resources.php?c=182&cid=45&year=2000&p=385891 AIME 2000II/7]
+* [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/resources.php?c=182&cid=45&year=2000&p=385891 2000 AIME II Problem 7]
 ==See also==

Page

Toolbox

Search

Difference between revisions of "Combinatorial identity"

Revision as of 08:17, 10 March 2009

Contents

Hockey-Stick Identity

Proof

Vandermonde's Identity

Examples

See also