Difference between revisions of "Combinatorial identity"
(→Examples) |
(Another identity (sum_{i=0}^k k choose i = 2k choose k -- what is this called?!)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
==Hockey-Stick Identity== | ==Hockey-Stick Identity== | ||
For <math>n,r\in\mathbb{N}, n>r,\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}={n+1\choose r+1}</math>. | For <math>n,r\in\mathbb{N}, n>r,\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}={n+1\choose r+1}</math>. | ||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
==Vandermonde's Identity== | ==Vandermonde's Identity== | ||
Vandermonde's Identity states that <math>\sum_{k=0}^r\binom mk\binom n{r-k}=\binom{m+n}r</math>, which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of <math>r</math> objects from a group of <math>m+n</math> objects must have some <math>0\le k\le r</math> objects from group <math>m</math> and the remaining from group <math>n</math>. | Vandermonde's Identity states that <math>\sum_{k=0}^r\binom mk\binom n{r-k}=\binom{m+n}r</math>, which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of <math>r</math> objects from a group of <math>m+n</math> objects must have some <math>0\le k\le r</math> objects from group <math>m</math> and the remaining from group <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Another Identity== | ||
+ | |||
+ | \[ | ||
+ | \sum_{i=0}^k \binom{k}{i}^2=\binom{2k}{k} | ||
+ | \] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Hat Proof=== | ||
+ | We have <math>2k</math> different hats. We split them into two groups, each with k hats: then we choose <math>i</math> hats from the first group and <math>k-i</math> hats from the second group. This may be done in <math>\binom{k}{i}^2</math> ways. Evidently, to generate all possible choices of <math>k</math> hats from the <math>2k</math> hats, we must choose <math>i=0,1,\cdots,k</math> hats from the first <math>k</math> and the remaining <math>k-i</math> hats from the second <math>k</math>; the sum over all such <math>i</math> is the number of ways of choosing <math>k</math> hats from <math>2k</math>. Therefore <math>\sum_{i=0}^k \binom{k}{i}^2=\binom{2k}{k}</math>, as desired. | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == |
Revision as of 11:29, 10 March 2009
Contents
[hide]Hockey-Stick Identity
For .
This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.
An image is supposed to go here. You can help us out by creating one and editing it in. Thanks.
Proof
Inductive Proof
This identity can be proven by induction on .
Base Case
Let .
.
Inductive Step
Suppose, for some ,
.
Then
.
Algebraic Proof
It can also be proven algebraically with Pascal's Identity, .
Note that
, which is equivalent to the desired result.
Combinatorial Proof
Imagine that we are distributing indistinguishable candies to
distinguishable children. By a direct application of Balls and Urns, there are
ways to do this. Alternatively, we can first give
candies to the oldest child so that we are essentially giving
candies to
kids and again, with Balls and Urns,
, which simplifies to the desired result.
Vandermonde's Identity
Vandermonde's Identity states that , which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of
objects from a group of
objects must have some
objects from group
and the remaining from group
.
Another Identity
\[ \sum_{i=0}^k \binom{k}{i}^2=\binom{2k}{k} \]
Hat Proof
We have different hats. We split them into two groups, each with k hats: then we choose
hats from the first group and
hats from the second group. This may be done in
ways. Evidently, to generate all possible choices of
hats from the
hats, we must choose
hats from the first
and the remaining
hats from the second
; the sum over all such
is the number of ways of choosing
hats from
. Therefore
, as desired.