Difference between revisions of "User talk:Azjps"

(Cone: new section)
("Refers to": new section)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Hi Azjps,  thanks for the cones!  Two (hopefully minor) requests: right now, both cones seem really large.  It is possible to make them smaller or put them in a box to the side or something?  Also, in the oblique cone, the segment labeled <math>r</math> shouldn't be, but it might be nice to include an actual radius of the circle in the picture, too.
 
Hi Azjps,  thanks for the cones!  Two (hopefully minor) requests: right now, both cones seem really large.  It is possible to make them smaller or put them in a box to the side or something?  Also, in the oblique cone, the segment labeled <math>r</math> shouldn't be, but it might be nice to include an actual radius of the circle in the picture, too.
 
Thanks!  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 23:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 
Thanks!  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 23:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== "Refers to" ==
 +
 +
Hi Azjps, you've been doing a lot of nice work.  I have one minor recurring complaint: you begin a lot of articles with a phrase like, "An invariant refers to ...."  This doesn't make sense.  There are (at least) two possible alternatives: one is, "The term invariant refers to ..." and the other is, "An invariant is ...."  I personally prefer the latter, as it's substantially more direct.  Anyhow, this is obviously not a huge deal, but I just thought I'd mention it.  --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:38, 2 March 2010


Discussion

Note

I am testing a short greasemonkey script to (semi-)automatically format contest articles, under the hope that this can make the articles here consistent and easily accessible. Apologies for the flood of edits; comments and suggestions are greatly welcomed. azjps (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Cone

Hi Azjps, thanks for the cones! Two (hopefully minor) requests: right now, both cones seem really large. It is possible to make them smaller or put them in a box to the side or something? Also, in the oblique cone, the segment labeled $r$ shouldn't be, but it might be nice to include an actual radius of the circle in the picture, too. Thanks! --JBL 23:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

"Refers to"

Hi Azjps, you've been doing a lot of nice work. I have one minor recurring complaint: you begin a lot of articles with a phrase like, "An invariant refers to ...." This doesn't make sense. There are (at least) two possible alternatives: one is, "The term invariant refers to ..." and the other is, "An invariant is ...." I personally prefer the latter, as it's substantially more direct. Anyhow, this is obviously not a huge deal, but I just thought I'd mention it. --JBL 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)