Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parabola"
(→Separate articles for focus & directrix?: new section) |
m (whoopsy, forgot signature) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Separate articles for focus & directrix? == | == Separate articles for focus & directrix? == | ||
− | Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them. | + | Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them. --[[User:1=2|1=2]] 14:46, 22 March 2012 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 22 March 2012
When I tried to insert math tags around the equation, it "failed to parse." Help appreciated. Also, this is definitely incomplete. I plan to add more when I get back tonight. --Mysmartmouth 11:07, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
Separate articles for focus & directrix?
Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them. --1=2 14:46, 22 March 2012 (EDT)