Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parabola"

(Separate articles for focus & directrix?: new section)
m (whoopsy, forgot signature)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Separate articles for focus & directrix? ==
 
== Separate articles for focus & directrix? ==
  
Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them.
+
Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them. --[[User:1=2|1=2]] 14:46, 22 March 2012 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:46, 22 March 2012

When I tried to insert math tags around the equation, it "failed to parse." Help appreciated. Also, this is definitely incomplete. I plan to add more when I get back tonight. --Mysmartmouth 11:07, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Separate articles for focus & directrix?

Do we really need separate articles for the focus and directrix of a parabola? I think we could give them a better coverage here instead of making a whole new article on them. --1=2 14:46, 22 March 2012 (EDT)