Difference between revisions of "2014 USAJMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution) |
m (→Solution) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
Define <math>S(n) = n + s_b(n)</math>, and call a number ''unrepresentable'' if it cannot equal <math>S(n)</math> for a positive integer <math>n</math>. | Define <math>S(n) = n + s_b(n)</math>, and call a number ''unrepresentable'' if it cannot equal <math>S(n)</math> for a positive integer <math>n</math>. | ||
− | We claim that in the interval <math> | + | We claim that in the interval <math>(b^p, b^{p+1}]</math> there exists an unrepresentable number, for every positive integer <math>p</math>. |
If <math>b^p</math> is unrepresentable, we're done. Otherwise, time for our lemma: | If <math>b^p</math> is unrepresentable, we're done. Otherwise, time for our lemma: |
Revision as of 17:07, 30 April 2014
Problem
Let be an integer, and let denote the sum of the digits of when it is written in base . Show that there are infinitely many positive integers that cannot be represented in the form , where is a positive integer.
Solution
Define , and call a number unrepresentable if it cannot equal for a positive integer . We claim that in the interval there exists an unrepresentable number, for every positive integer .
If is unrepresentable, we're done. Otherwise, time for our lemma:
Lemma: Define the function to equal the number of integer x less than such that . If for some x, then .
Proof: Let be the set of integers x less than such that . Then for every integer in , append the digit to the front of it to create a valid integer in . Also, notice that . Removing the digit from the front of x creates a number that is not in . Hence, , but there exists an element of not corresponding with , so .
Note that our lemma combined with the Pigeonhole Principle essentially proves the claim. Therefore, because there are infinitely many intervals containing an unrepresentable number, there are infinitely many unrepresentable numbers.