Difference between revisions of "1989 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"

Revision as of 04:42, 8 March 2018

Problem

The 20 members of a local tennis club have scheduled exactly 14 two-person games among themselves, with each member playing in at least one game. Prove that within this schedule there must be a set of 6 games with 12 distinct players

Solution

Solution 1

Consider a graph with $20$ vertices and $14$ edges. The sum of the degrees of the vertices is $28$ ; by the Pigeonhole Principle at least $12$ vertices have degrees of $1$ and at most $8$ vertices have degrees greater than $1$ . If we keep deleting edges of vertices with degree greater than $1$ (a maximum of $8$ such edges), then we are left with at least $6$ edges, and all of the vertices have degree either $0$ or $1$ . These $6$ edges represent the $6$ games with $12$ distinct players.

Solution 2

Let a slot be a place we can put a member in a game, so there are two slots per game, and 28 slots total. We begin by filling exactly 20 slots each with a distinct member since each member must play at least one game. Let there be $m$ games with both slots filled and $n$ games with only one slot filled, so $2m+n=20$ . Since there are only 14 games, $m+n \leq 14 \Longrightarrow 2m+n \leq 14+m \Longleftrightarrow 20 \leq 14+m \Longrightarrow m \geq 6$ , so there must be at least 6 games with two distinct members each, and we must have our desired set of 6 games.

Solution 3

Assume the contrary.

Consider the largest set of disjoint edges $E$ . By assumption it has less than $6$ edges, i.e. maximum $10$ vertices. Call it a vertex set $V$ .

$10$ vertices remain outside $V$ and each has to be attached to at least one edge. Now, if any two vertices outside $V$ are connected by, say, edge $e$ , we could have included $e$ in $E$ and gotten a larger disjoint set, so - a contradiction. Therefore the only option would be that all vertices outside $V$ are connected each by one edge to some vertices inside $V$ . That would take $10$ edges, but $E$ already includes $5$ - again a contradiction.

All possibilities yield a contradiction, so our assumption can not be correct.

(Cases when largest set $E$ is smaller than $6$ are equivalent and weaker)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 === Solution 2===
 Let a slot be a place we can put a member in a game, so there are two slots per game, and 28 slots total.  We begin by filling exactly 20 slots each with a distinct member since each member must play at least one game.  Let there be <math>m</math> games with both slots filled and <math>n</math> games with only one slot filled, so <math>2m+n=20</math>.  Since there are only 14 games, <math>m+n \leq 14 \Longrightarrow 2m+n \leq 14+m \Longleftrightarrow 20 \leq 14+m \Longrightarrow m \geq 6</math>, so there must be at least 6 games with two distinct members each, and we must have our desired set of 6 games.
+=== Solution 3===
+Assume the contrary.
+Consider the largest set of disjoint edges <math>E</math>. By assumption it has less than <math>6</math> edges, i.e. maximum <math>10</math> vertices.
+Call it a vertex set <math>V</math>.
+<math>10</math> vertices remain outside <math>V</math> and each has to be attached to at least one edge.
+Now, if any two vertices outside <math>V</math> are connected by, say, edge <math>e</math>, we could have included <math>e</math> in <math>E</math> and gotten a larger disjoint set, so - a contradiction.
+Therefore the only option would be that all vertices outside <math>V</math> are connected each by one edge to some vertices inside <math>V</math>. That would take <math>10</math> edges, but <math>E</math> already includes <math>5</math> - again a contradiction.
+All possibilities yield a contradiction, so our assumption can not be correct.
+(Cases when largest set <math>E</math> is smaller than <math>6</math> are equivalent and weaker)
 == See Also ==

1989 USAMO (Problems • Resources)
Preceded by Problem 1	Followed by Problem 3
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5
All USAMO Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search