Difference between revisions of "1993 USAMO Problems/Problem 3"
m (→Solution) |
m (→Resources) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
<P align="right"><math>\mathbb{Q.E.D}</math></P> | <P align="right"><math>\mathbb{Q.E.D}</math></P> | ||
− | == | + | == See Also == |
{{USAMO box|year=1993|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | {{USAMO box|year=1993|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
* [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=356413#p356413 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks] | * [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=356413#p356413 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks] | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] |
Revision as of 07:56, 19 July 2016
Problem 3
Consider functions which satisfy
(i) | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
(ii) | ![]() | |
(iii) | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Find, with proof, the smallest constant such that

for every function satisfying (i)-(iii) and every
in
.
Solution
My claim:
Lemma 1) for
For ,
(ii)
Assume that it is true for , then
By principle of induction, lemma 1 is proven.
Lemma 2) For any ,
and
,
.
(lemma 1 and (iii) )
(because
(i) )
,
. Thus,
works.
Let's look at a function
It clearly have property (i) and (ii). For and WLOG let
,
For ,
. Thus, property (iii) holds too. Thus
is one of the legit function.
but approach to
when
is extremely close to
from the right side.
See Also
1993 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.