Difference between revisions of "2014 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"
Lucasxia01 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
Lucasxia01 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Since <math>k \neq 0</math> and <math>m</math> is odd, both cases are impossible, so we must have: | Since <math>k \neq 0</math> and <math>m</math> is odd, both cases are impossible, so we must have: | ||
<cmath>m^2f(4k - m^2) = f(m^3) = 0</cmath> | <cmath>m^2f(4k - m^2) = f(m^3) = 0</cmath> | ||
− | Then we can let <math>k</math> be anything except 0, and get <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x \equiv 3 \pmod{4}</math> except <math>-m^2</math>. Also since <math>x^2f(-x) = f(x)^2</math>, we have <math>f(x) = 0 \Rightarrow f(-x) = 0</math>, so <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x \equiv 1 \pmod{4}</math> except <math>m^2</math>. So <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x</math> except <math>\pm m^2</math>. Since <math>f(m) \neq 0</math>, <math>m = \pm m^2</math>. Squaring, <math>m^2 = m^4</math> and dividing by <math>m</math>, <math>m = m^3</math>. Since <math>f(m^3) = 0</math>, <math>f(m) = 0</math>, which is a contradiction for <math>m \neq 1</math>. However, if we plug in <math>x = 1</math> and <math>y</math> as an arbitrary large number with <math>f(y) = 0</math> into the original equation, we get <math>0 = 1</math> which is a clear contradiction, so our only solutions are <math>f(x) = 0</math> and <math>f(x) = x^2</math>. | + | Then we can let <math>k</math> be anything except 0, and get <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x \equiv 3 \pmod{4}</math> except <math>-m^2</math>. Also since <math>x^2f(-x) = f(x)^2</math>, we have <math>f(x) = 0 \Rightarrow f(-x) = 0</math>, so <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x \equiv 1 \pmod{4}</math> except <math>m^2</math>. So <math>f(x)</math> is 0 for all <math>x</math> except <math>\pm m^2</math>. Since <math>f(m) \neq 0</math>, <math>m = \pm m^2</math>. Squaring, <math>m^2 = m^4</math> and dividing by <math>m</math>, <math>m = m^3</math>. Since <math>f(m^3) = 0</math>, <math>f(m) = 0</math>, which is a contradiction for <math>m \neq 1</math>. However, if we plug in <math>x = 1</math> with <math>f(1) = 1</math> and <math>y</math> as an arbitrary large number with <math>f(y) = 0</math> into the original equation, we get <math>0 = 1</math> which is a clear contradiction, so our only solutions are <math>f(x) = 0</math> and <math>f(x) = x^2</math>. |
[[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] | ||
[[Category:Functional Equation Problems]] | [[Category:Functional Equation Problems]] |
Revision as of 18:12, 13 April 2017
Problem
Let be the set of integers. Find all functions such that for all with .
Solution
Note: This solution is kind of rough. I didn't want to put my 7-page solution all over again. It would be nice if someone could edit in the details of the expansions.
Lemma 1: . Proof: Assume the opposite for a contradiction. Plug in (because we assumed that ), . What you get eventually reduces to: which is a contradiction since the LHS is divisible by 2 but not 4.
Then plug in into the original equation and simplify by Lemma 1. We get: Then:
Therefore, must be 0 or .
Now either is for all or there exists such that . The first case gives a valid solution. In the second case, we let in the original equation and simplify to get: But we know that , so: Since is not 0, is 0 for all (including 0). Now either is 0 for all , or there exists some such that . Then must be odd. We can let in the original equation, and since is 0 for all , stuff cancels and we get: [b]for .[/b] Now, let and we get: Now, either both sides are 0 or both are equal to . If both are then: which simplifies to: Since and is odd, both cases are impossible, so we must have: Then we can let be anything except 0, and get is 0 for all except . Also since , we have , so is 0 for all except . So is 0 for all except . Since , . Squaring, and dividing by , . Since , , which is a contradiction for . However, if we plug in with and as an arbitrary large number with into the original equation, we get which is a clear contradiction, so our only solutions are and .