Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"
m (The spacing is bugging me...) |
m |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page | https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page | ||
-------- | -------- | ||
| + | {{AMC22 box|year=3000000000000|ab=A|before=First question|num-a=2}} | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 20 August 2019
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
Gmass is Ssto in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if 
and 
, 
, Sato is amazing.
Learn about Sato: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato
Back to Main Page: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
