Difference between revisions of "Slalom conjuncture"
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors. | Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors. | ||
<h1>Proof</h1> | <h1>Proof</h1> | ||
− | Unfortunately, only Doggo and | + | Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture. |
<h2>Broken proof</h2> | <h2>Broken proof</h2> | ||
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet. | For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet. | ||
<code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code> | <code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code> |
Revision as of 00:38, 16 June 2021
Contents
[hide]The Slalom Conjuncture
As discovered by Elbertpark
Written by Elbertpark
Idea made by Elbertpark...
and so on
What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?
The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square , then this square has a maximum of factors starting from 3.
Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.
Number | # of factors | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 9 | 3 |
5 | 25 | 3 |
7 | 49 | 3 |
9 | 81 | 5 |
11 | 121 | 3 |
... | ... | ... |
81 | 6561 | 9 |
4001 | 16008001 | 3 |
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
Proof
Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.
Broken proof
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.
This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.