Difference between revisions of "2006 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
m (→Resources) |
m (→Solution) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<cmath> (a_1-a_0) + (a_2-a_1) + \dotsb + (a_r-a_{r-1}) = a_r-a_0 = 0, </cmath> | <cmath> (a_1-a_0) + (a_2-a_1) + \dotsb + (a_r-a_{r-1}) = a_r-a_0 = 0, </cmath> | ||
it follows that for some index <math>j</math>, | it follows that for some index <math>j</math>, | ||
− | <cmath> a_j - a_{j+1} = -(a_{j+ | + | <cmath> a_j - a_{j+1} = -(a_{j+1} - a_{j+2}), </cmath> |
or <math>a_j = a_{j+2} = P^2(a_j)</math>. Since <math>a = a_r = P^{r-j}(a_j)</math>, it then follows that <math>P^2(a) = a</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | or <math>a_j = a_{j+2} = P^2(a_j)</math>. Since <math>a = a_r = P^{r-j}(a_j)</math>, it then follows that <math>P^2(a) = a</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:42, 7 September 2021
Problem
(Dan Schwarz, Romania) Let be a polynomial of degree with integer coefficients, and let be a positive integer. Consider the polynomial , where occurs times. Prove that there are at most integers such that .
Solution
We use the notation for .
Lemma 1. The problem statement holds for .
Proof. Suppose that , are integers such that and for all indices . Let the set have distinct elements. It suffices to show that .
If for all indices , then the polynomial has at least roots; since is not linear, it follows that by the division algorithm.
Suppose on the other hand that , for some index . In this case, we claim that is constant for every index . Indeed, we note that so . Similarly, so . It follows that .
This proves our claim. It follows that the polynomial has at least roots. Since is not linear it follows again that , as desired. Thus the lemma is proven.
Lemma 2. If is a positive integer such that for some positive integer , then .
Proof. Let us denote , and , for positive integers . Then , and It follows that is constant for all indices ; let us abbreviate this quantity . Now, since it follows that for some index , or . Since , it then follows that , as desired.
Now, if there are more than integers for which , then by Lemma 2, there are more than integers such that , which is a contradiction by Lemma 1. Thus the problem is solved.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
- 1974 USAMO Problems/Problem 1, which implies a special case of this problem
2006 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |