Difference between revisions of "2013 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Skywalker94 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution: Fixed inconsistent formatting.) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. | Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[2013 IMO]] | *[[2013 IMO]] |
Revision as of 16:57, 11 July 2023
Problem
Prove that for any pair of positive integers and , there exist positive integers (not necessarily different) such that
.
Solution
We prove the claim by induction on .
Base case: If then , so the claim is true for all positive integers .
Inductive hypothesis: Suppose that for some the claim is true for , for all .
Inductive step: Let be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of :
[Case 1: is even]
[Case 2: is odd]
In either case, for some .
By the induction hypothesis we can choose such that .
Therefore, since was arbitrary, the claim is true for , for all . Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers , .
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.