Difference between revisions of "2013 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Alternative Solution) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
We will prove by constructing telescoping product: | We will prove by constructing telescoping product: | ||
<cmath>\frac{a_2}{a_1}\cdot\frac{a_3}{a_2}\cdot\frac{a_4}{a_3} \cdot \frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k} = \frac{a_{k+1}}{a_1} = \frac{\left(a_1+2^{k}-1\right)}{a_1}</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{a_2}{a_1}\cdot\frac{a_3}{a_2}\cdot\frac{a_4}{a_3} \cdot \frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k} = \frac{a_{k+1}}{a_1} = \frac{\left(a_1+2^{k}-1\right)}{a_1}</cmath> | ||
− | where each fraction <math>\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_i}=\frac{a_{i}+\Delta_i}{a_i}</math> can also be written as <math>\frac{m_i+1}{m_i}</math> for some positive integer <math>m_i</math>. Telescoping property implies <math>\ | + | where each fraction <math>\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_i}=\frac{a_{i}+\Delta_i}{a_i}</math> can also be written as <math>\frac{m_i+1}{m_i}</math> for some positive integer <math>m_i</math>. Telescoping property implies <math>\sum_{i=1}^{k}{\Delta_i}=2^{k}-1</math>. We will show that the set of all <math>\Delta_i</math> can be taken to be a set of <math>2^j</math> where <math>0\le j \le k-1</math>. <math>\Delta_i</math> of this form can be constructed in the following way. If <math>n</math> is odd use fraction <math>\frac{n+1}{n}</math>, else you can use <math>\frac{\frac{n}{2}+1}{\frac{n}{2}}=\frac{n+2}{n}</math> constructing <math>\Delta=2</math> |
--[[User:alexander_skabelin|alexander_skabelin]] 9:24, 11 July 2023 (EST) | --[[User:alexander_skabelin|alexander_skabelin]] 9:24, 11 July 2023 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:49, 11 July 2023
Contents
[hide]Problem
Prove that for any pair of positive integers and
, there exist
positive integers
(not necessarily different) such that
.
Solution
We prove the claim by induction on .
Base case: If then
, so the claim is true for all positive integers
.
Inductive hypothesis: Suppose that for some the claim is true for
, for all
.
Inductive step: Let be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of
:
[Case 1: is even]
[Case 2: is odd]
In either case, for some
.
By the induction hypothesis we can choose such that
.
Therefore, since was arbitrary, the claim is true for
, for all
. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers
,
.
Alternative Solution
We will prove by constructing telescoping product:
where each fraction
can also be written as
for some positive integer
. Telescoping property implies
. We will show that the set of all
can be taken to be a set of
where
.
of this form can be constructed in the following way. If
is odd use fraction
, else you can use
constructing
--alexander_skabelin 9:24, 11 July 2023 (EST)
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.