Difference between revisions of "Vieta's Formulas"
(category) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Let <math>P(x)</math> be a polynomial of degree <math>n</math>, so <math>P(x)={a_n}x^n+{a_{n-1}}x^{n-1}+\cdots+{a_1}x+a_0</math>, | Let <math>P(x)</math> be a polynomial of degree <math>n</math>, so <math>P(x)={a_n}x^n+{a_{n-1}}x^{n-1}+\cdots+{a_1}x+a_0</math>, | ||
− | where the coefficient of <math> | + | where the coefficient of <math>x^{i}</math> is <math>{a}_i</math> and <math>a_n \neq 0</math>. As a consequence of the [[Fundamental Theorem of Algebra]], we can also write <math>P(x)=a_n(x-r_1)(x-r_2)\cdots(x-r_n)</math>, where <math>{r}_i</math> are the roots of <math>P(x)</math>. We thus have that |
<center><math> a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_1x+a_0 = a_n(x-r_1)(x-r_2)\cdots(x-r_n).</math></center> | <center><math> a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_1x+a_0 = a_n(x-r_1)(x-r_2)\cdots(x-r_n).</math></center> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<math> a_nx^n - a_n(r_1+r_2+\!\cdots\!+r_n)x^{n-1} + a_n(r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 +\! \cdots\! + r_{n-1}r_n)x^{n-2} +\! \cdots\! + (-1)^na_n r_1r_2\cdots r_n.</math> | <math> a_nx^n - a_n(r_1+r_2+\!\cdots\!+r_n)x^{n-1} + a_n(r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 +\! \cdots\! + r_{n-1}r_n)x^{n-2} +\! \cdots\! + (-1)^na_n r_1r_2\cdots r_n.</math> | ||
− | The coefficient of <math> | + | The coefficient of <math> x^k </math> in this expression will be the <math>k </math>th [[symmetric sum]] of the <math>r_i</math>. |
− | We now have two different expressions for <math> | + | We now have two different expressions for <math>P(x)</math>. These must be equal. However, the only way for two polynomials to be equal for all values of <math>x</math> is for each of their corresponding coefficients to be equal. So, starting with the coefficient of <math> x^n </math>, we see that |
− | <center><math> | + | <center><math>a_n = a_n</math></center> |
<center><math> a_{n-1} = -a_n(r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_n)</math></center> | <center><math> a_{n-1} = -a_n(r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_n)</math></center> | ||
<center><math> a_{n-2} = a_n(r_1r_2+r_1r_3+\cdots+r_{n-1}r_n)</math></center> | <center><math> a_{n-2} = a_n(r_1r_2+r_1r_3+\cdots+r_{n-1}r_n)</math></center> | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<center><math>a_0 = (-1)^n a_n r_1r_2\cdots r_n</math></center> | <center><math>a_0 = (-1)^n a_n r_1r_2\cdots r_n</math></center> | ||
− | More commonly, these are written with the roots on one side and the <math> | + | More commonly, these are written with the roots on one side and the <math>a_i</math> on the other (this can be arrived at by dividing both sides of all the equations by <math>a_n</math>). |
− | If we denote <math> | + | If we denote <math>\sigma_k</math> as the <math>k</math>th symmetric sum, then we can write those formulas more compactly as <math>\sigma_k = (-1)^k\cdot \frac{a_{n-k}}{a_n{}}</math>, for <math>1\le k\le {n}</math>. |
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* [[Newton sums]] | * [[Newton sums]] | ||
− | == | + | == External Links == |
− | [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VietasFormulas.html Mathworld's Article] | + | *[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VietasFormulas.html Mathworld's Article] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Elementary algebra]] |
Revision as of 20:57, 10 December 2007
Vieta's formulas are a set of equations relating the roots and the coefficients of polynomials.
Introduction
Let be a polynomial of degree , so , where the coefficient of is and . As a consequence of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, we can also write , where are the roots of . We thus have that
Expanding out the right hand side gives us
The coefficient of in this expression will be the th symmetric sum of the .
We now have two different expressions for . These must be equal. However, the only way for two polynomials to be equal for all values of is for each of their corresponding coefficients to be equal. So, starting with the coefficient of , we see that
More commonly, these are written with the roots on one side and the on the other (this can be arrived at by dividing both sides of all the equations by ).
If we denote as the th symmetric sum, then we can write those formulas more compactly as , for .