Difference between revisions of "1969 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
==Solution 2== | ==Solution 2== | ||
− | + | We start by stating a simple proposition. Let <math>L</math> be a line and three circles | |
+ | with centers <math>C_1, C_2, C_3</math> tangent to the line <math>L</math>, all on one side. Denote | ||
+ | <math>A_1, A_2, A_3</math> the points on the line where the circles touch it. Then there | ||
+ | is a second line tangent to the three circles if and only if <math>C_1, C_2, C_3</math> | ||
+ | are collinear, and this is the case if and only if | ||
+ | <math>\frac{\overline{C_1A_1} - \overline{C_2A_2}}</math> | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 7 August 2024
Problem
A semicircular arc is drawn with
as diameter.
is a point on
other than
and
, and
is the foot of the perpendicular from
to
. We consider three circles,
, all tangent to the line
. Of these,
is inscribed in
, while
and
are both tangent to
and
, one on each side of
. Prove that
, and
have a second tangent in common.
Solution
Denote the triangle sides . Let
be the circumcircle of the right angle triangle
centered at the midpoint
of its hypotenuse
. Let
be the tangency points of the circles
with the line AB. In an inversion with the center
and positive power
(
being the inversion circle radius), the line AB is carried into itself, the circle
is carried into the altitude line
and the altitude line
into the circle
. This implies that the circle
intersecting the inversion circle
is carried into itself, but this is possible only if the circle
is perpendicular to the inversion circle
. It follows that the tangency point
of the circle
is the intersection of the inversion circle
with the line
. Similarly, in an inversion with the center B and positive power
(
being the inversion circle radius), the line AB is carried into itself, the circle
is carried into the altitude line
and the altitude line
into the circle
. This implies that the circle
intersecting the inversion circle
is carried into itself, but this is possible only if the circle
is perpendicular to the inversion circle
. It follows that the tangency point S of the circle
is the intersection of the inversion circle
with the line
.
The distance between the tangency points S, T is the equal to ST = AT - AS = AT - (AB - BS) = AC - (AB - BC) = a + b - c. The radius r of the incircle of the right angle triangle
is equal to
where and s are the area and semiperimeter of the triangle
, for example, because of an obvious identity
or just because the angle is right. Therefore, ST = 2r. Let R' be the midpoint of ST. Then
Therefore, the points are identical and the midpoint of the segment ST is the tangency point R of the incircle
with the triangle side c = AB. It follows that the normals to the hypotenuse AB at the tangency points S, T of the circles
are tangent to the incircle
. Radii
of the circles
are now easily calculated:
Denote the centers of the circles
. The line
cuts the midline RI of the trapezoid
at the distance from the point R equal to
As a result, the centers are collinear (in fact, I is the midpoint of the segment
). The common center line
and the common external tangent AB of the circles
meet at their common external homothety center
and the other common external tangent of the circles
from the common homothety center H is a tangent to the circle
as well.
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by yetti. The original thread can be found here: [1]
Remarks, added by pf02, August 2024
It is worth repeating here the note hal9v4ik makes on https://aops.com/community/p376814. This problem is a consequence of a particular case of Thebault's problem III (the Sawayama-Thebault-Streefkerk theorem; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9bault%27s_theorem). However, this should not be viewed as a solution to the problem. I believe the point of the problem is proving the Sawayama-Thebault-Streefkerk theorem in a particular case. Also, the theorem is not well known, so it should not be used as a reference.
Below I will give another solution, based on analytic (coordinate) geometry. It is not elegant, but it is very straightforward and simple (except for the computations which can be tedious at times.)
Solution 2
We start by stating a simple proposition. Let be a line and three circles
with centers
tangent to the line
, all on one side. Denote
the points on the line where the circles touch it. Then there
is a second line tangent to the three circles if and only if
are collinear, and this is the case if and only if
$\frac{\overline{C_1A_1} - \overline{C_2A_2}}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING FOR NOW, SO THAT I DON'T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR
See Also
1969 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |