Difference between revisions of "1969 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
m |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This implies that if <math>f(x_1)=0</math>, | This implies that if <math>f(x_1)=0</math>, | ||
<cmath>\tan{x_1}=\frac{\cos{a_1}+\frac{1}{2}\cos{a_2}+\frac{1}{4}\cos{a_3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}\cos{a_n}}{\sin{a_1}+\frac{1}{2}\sin{a_2}+\frac{1}{4}\sin{a_3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}\sin{a_n}}</cmath> | <cmath>\tan{x_1}=\frac{\cos{a_1}+\frac{1}{2}\cos{a_2}+\frac{1}{4}\cos{a_3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}\cos{a_n}}{\sin{a_1}+\frac{1}{2}\sin{a_2}+\frac{1}{4}\sin{a_3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}\sin{a_n}}</cmath> | ||
− | Since the period of <math>\tan{x}</math> is <math>\pi</math>, this means that <math>\tan{x_1}=\tan{x_1+\pi}=\tan{x_1+m\pi}</math> for any natural number <math>m</math>. That implies that every value <math>x_1+m\pi</math> is a zero of <math>f(x)</math>. | + | Since the period of <math>\tan{x}</math> is <math>\pi</math>, this means that <math>\tan{x_1}=\tan{(x_1+\pi)}=\tan{(x_1+m\pi)}</math> for any natural number <math>m</math>. That implies that every value <math>x_1+m\pi</math> is a zero of <math>f(x)</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | ==Remarks (added by pf02, August 2024)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Both solutions given above are incorrect. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first solution is hopelessly incorrect. It states that (and relies on it) | ||
+ | if <math>f(x)</math> has period <math>2\pi</math> and <math>f(x_1) = f(x_2)</math> then <math>x_2 - x_1 = m\pi</math> for | ||
+ | some integer <math>m</math>. This is plainly wrong (think of <math>\sin{\pi/3} = \sin{2\pi/3}</math>). | ||
+ | There is an obvious "red flag" as far as solutions go, namely the solution did | ||
+ | not use that <math>f(x_1) = 0</math> and <math>f(x_2) = 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second solution starts promising, but then it goes on to prove the converse | ||
+ | of the given problem, namely that if <math>f(x_1) = 0</math> then <math>f(x_1 + m\pi) = 0</math> for | ||
+ | any <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Below, I will give a solution to the problem. I feel a little uneasy about it, | ||
+ | it has an "orange flag", namely I make no use of the fact that the coefficients | ||
+ | if <math>\cos{(a_k + x)}</math> are the given powers of <math>1/2</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Do the proof for the slightly more general function | ||
+ | <math>f(x) = b_1\cos{(a_1 + x)} + b_1\cos{(a_1 + x)} + \cdots + b_n\cos{(a_n + x)}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just like the previous attempt to solve the problem, start by using the formula | ||
+ | <math>\cos{(\alpha + \beta)} = \cos{\alpha}\cos{\beta} - \sin{\alpha}\sin{\beta}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We get | ||
+ | <math>f(x)=(b_1\cos{a_1} + b_2\cos{a_2} + \cdots + b_n\cos{a_n})\cos{x} - | ||
+ | b_1\sin{a_1} + b_2\sin{a_2} + \cdots + b_n\sin{a_n})\sin{x}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | TO BE CONTINUED. I AM JUST SAVING NOW SO THAT I DON'T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=1969|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{IMO box|year=1969|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Revision as of 15:49, 8 August 2024
Contents
[hide]Problem
Let be real constants,
a real variable, and
Given that
prove that
for some integer
Solution
Because the period of is
, the period of
is also
.
We can get
for
. Thus,
for some integer
Solution 2 (longer)
By the cosine addition formula,
This implies that if
,
Since the period of
is
, this means that
for any natural number
. That implies that every value
is a zero of
.
Remarks (added by pf02, August 2024)
Both solutions given above are incorrect.
The first solution is hopelessly incorrect. It states that (and relies on it)
if has period
and
then
for
some integer
. This is plainly wrong (think of
).
There is an obvious "red flag" as far as solutions go, namely the solution did
not use that
and
.
The second solution starts promising, but then it goes on to prove the converse
of the given problem, namely that if then
for
any
.
Below, I will give a solution to the problem. I feel a little uneasy about it,
it has an "orange flag", namely I make no use of the fact that the coefficients
if are the given powers of
.
Solution
Do the proof for the slightly more general function
Just like the previous attempt to solve the problem, start by using the formula
.
We get
.
TO BE CONTINUED. I AM JUST SAVING NOW SO THAT I DON'T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.
See Also
1969 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |