Difference between revisions of "2008 IMO Problems/Problem 3"
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Now armed with <math>a+b-1>\sqrt{p}</math> and (2), we get | Now armed with <math>a+b-1>\sqrt{p}</math> and (2), we get | ||
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
− | + | 4(n^2+1) \le p( a^2+b^2 - 2(a+b-1) ) < \\ | |
− | 4(n^2+1) | + | < p( p-2\sqrt{p} ) < \\ |
− | + | < u^2(u-1)^2, | |
− | |||
− | |||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
where <math>u=\sqrt{p}.</math> | where <math>u=\sqrt{p}.</math> |
Revision as of 23:33, 3 September 2008
Problem
Prove that there are infinitely many positive integers such that has a prime divisor greater than .
Solution
The main idea is to take a gaussian prime and multiply it by a "twice as small" to get . The rest is just making up the little details.
For each sufficiently large prime of the form , we shall find a corresponding satisfying the required condition with the prime number in question being . Since there exist infinitely many such primes and, for each of them, , we will have found infinitely many distinct satisfying the problem.
Take a prime of the form and consider its "sum-of-two squares" representation , which we know to exist for all such primes. As , assume without loss of generality that . If , then is what we are looking for, and as long as (and hence ) is large enough. Assume from now on that .
Since and are (obviously) co-prime, there must exist integers and such that In fact, if and are such numbers, then and work as well for any integer , so we can assume that .
Define and let's see why this was a good choice. For starters, notice that .
If , then from (1), we see that must divide and hence . In turn, and . Therefore, and so , from where . Finally, and the case is cleared.
We can safely assume now that As implies , we have so
Before we proceed, we would like to show first that . Observe that the function over reaches its minima on the ends, so given is minimized for , where it equals . So we want to show that which obviously holds for large .
Now armed with and (2), we get where
Finally,