Difference between revisions of "2008 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<cmath>p^2-2q \ge 1.</cmath> | <cmath>p^2-2q \ge 1.</cmath> | ||
But from <math>p = -1-q</math>, we get | But from <math>p = -1-q</math>, we get | ||
− | <cmath>p^2-2q = (1+q)^2-2q = 1 + q^2 \ ge 1,</cmath> | + | <cmath>p^2-2q = (1+q)^2-2q = 1 + q^2 \ge 1,</cmath> |
− | with equality holding iff <math>q = 0</math>. That proves part '''(i)''' and points us in the direction of looking for rational <math>\alpha,\beta,\gamma</math> for which <math>q=0</math> and (hence) <math>p=-1 | + | with equality holding iff <math>q = 0</math>. That proves part '''(i)''' and points us in the direction of looking for rational <math>\alpha,\beta,\gamma</math> for which <math>q=0</math> and (hence) <math>p=-1</math>, that is: |
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \alpha+\beta+\gamma & = 1\\ | ||
+ | \alpha\beta+\beta\gamma+\gamma\alpha & = 0 | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> |
Revision as of 20:52, 4 September 2008
Problem 2
(i) If , and are three real numbers, all different from , such that , then prove that . (With the sign for cyclic summation, this inequality could be rewritten as .)
(ii) Prove that equality is achieved for infinitely many triples of rational numbers , and .
Problem 2
(i) If , and are three real numbers, all different from , such that , then prove that . (With the sign for cyclic summation, this inequality could be rewritten as .)
(ii) Prove that equality is achieved for infinitely many triples of rational numbers , and .
Solution
Consider the transormation defined by and put . Since is also one-to one from to , the problem is equivalent to showing that subject to and that equallity holds for infinitely many triplets of rational .
Now, rewrite (2) as and express it as where and . Notice that (1) can be written as But from , we get with equality holding iff . That proves part (i) and points us in the direction of looking for rational for which and (hence) , that is: