Difference between revisions of "2008 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
with equality holding iff <math>q = 0</math>. That proves part '''(i)''' and points us in the direction of looking for rational <math>\alpha,\beta,\gamma</math> for which <math>q=0</math> and (hence) <math>p=-1</math>, that is: | with equality holding iff <math>q = 0</math>. That proves part '''(i)''' and points us in the direction of looking for rational <math>\alpha,\beta,\gamma</math> for which <math>q=0</math> and (hence) <math>p=-1</math>, that is: | ||
<cmath>\begin{align*} | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
− | \alpha+\beta+\gamma & = 1\ | + | \alpha+\beta+\gamma & = -1\ |
\alpha\beta+\beta\gamma+\gamma\alpha & = 0 | \alpha\beta+\beta\gamma+\gamma\alpha & = 0 | ||
\end{align*}</cmath> | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | Expressing <math>\alpha</math> from the first equation and substituting into the second, we get | ||
+ | <cmath>\beta\gamma + ( \beta+\gamma ) ( -1 - \beta -\gamma ) = 0</cmath> | ||
+ | as the sole equation we need to satisfy in rational numbers. |
Revision as of 21:56, 4 September 2008
Problem 2
(i) If ,
and
are three real numbers, all different from
, such that
, then prove that
.
(With the
sign for cyclic summation, this inequality could be rewritten as
.)
(ii) Prove that equality is achieved for infinitely many triples of rational numbers ,
and
.
Problem 2
(i) If ,
and
are three real numbers, all different from
, such that
, then prove that
.
(With the
sign for cyclic summation, this inequality could be rewritten as
.)
(ii) Prove that equality is achieved for infinitely many triples of rational numbers ,
and
.
Solution
Consider the transormation defined by
and put
. Since
is also one-to one from
to
, the problem is equivalent to showing that
subject to
and that equallity holds for infinitely many triplets of rational
.
Now, rewrite (2) as and express it as
where
and
. Notice that (1) can be written as
But from
, we get
with equality holding iff
. That proves part (i) and points us in the direction of looking for rational
for which
and (hence)
, that is:
Expressing
from the first equation and substituting into the second, we get
as the sole equation we need to satisfy in rational numbers.