Difference between revisions of "Steiner's Theorem"
(Got kicked out of computer lab because of halo players; came back to finish the proof) |
m (LaTeX errors FTL) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let <math>E</math> be the intersection of <math>AD</math> and <math>BC</math>, <math>F</math> be the midpiont of <math>AB</math>, <math>G</math> be the midpoint of <math>CD</math>, and <math>H</math> be the intersection of <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math>. We now claim that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math>. First note that, since <math>\angle DEC=\angle AEB</math> and <math>\angle EAB=\angle EDC</math> [this is because <math>AB\parallel CD</math>], we have that <math>\triangle EDC\sim \triangle EAB</math>. Then <math>\frac{EA}{AB}=\frac{ED}{DC}</math>, and <math>\frac{AF}{AB}=\frac{DG}{DC}=\frac{1}{2}</math>, so <math>\frac{EA}{AF}=\frac{ED}{DG}</math>. We earlier stated that <math>\angle EDC=\angle EAB</math>, so we have that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math> from SAS similarity. We have that <math>E</math>, <math>A</math>, and <math>D</math> are collinear, and since <math>F</math> and <math>G</math> are on the same side of line <math>AD</math>, we can see that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math> from SAS. Therefore <math>EF \parallel EG</math>, so <math>E</math>, <math>F</math>, and <math>G</math> are collinear. | Let <math>E</math> be the intersection of <math>AD</math> and <math>BC</math>, <math>F</math> be the midpiont of <math>AB</math>, <math>G</math> be the midpoint of <math>CD</math>, and <math>H</math> be the intersection of <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math>. We now claim that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math>. First note that, since <math>\angle DEC=\angle AEB</math> and <math>\angle EAB=\angle EDC</math> [this is because <math>AB\parallel CD</math>], we have that <math>\triangle EDC\sim \triangle EAB</math>. Then <math>\frac{EA}{AB}=\frac{ED}{DC}</math>, and <math>\frac{AF}{AB}=\frac{DG}{DC}=\frac{1}{2}</math>, so <math>\frac{EA}{AF}=\frac{ED}{DG}</math>. We earlier stated that <math>\angle EDC=\angle EAB</math>, so we have that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math> from SAS similarity. We have that <math>E</math>, <math>A</math>, and <math>D</math> are collinear, and since <math>F</math> and <math>G</math> are on the same side of line <math>AD</math>, we can see that <math>\triangle EAF \sim \triangle EDG</math> from SAS. Therefore <math>EF \parallel EG</math>, so <math>E</math>, <math>F</math>, and <math>G</math> are collinear. | ||
− | Now consider triangles <math>HBA</math> and <math>HDC</math>. Segments <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math> are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that <math>\triangle HAB \sim \triangle HCD</math>. It's also not hard to show that <math>\triangle HBE | + | Now consider triangles <math>HBA</math> and <math>HDC</math>. Segments <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math> are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that <math>\triangle HAB \sim \triangle HCD</math>. It's also not hard to show that <math>\triangle HBE \sim \triangle HDF</math> by SAS similarity. Therefore <math>\angle BHE=\angle DHF</math>, which implies that <math>F</math>, <math>G</math>, and <math>H</math> are collinear. This completes the proof. |
− | |||
− | |||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 07:03, 5 July 2011
Steiner's Theorem states that in a trapezoid with and , we have that the midpoint of and , the intersection of diagonals and , and the intersection of the sides and are collinear.
Proof
Let be the intersection of and , be the midpiont of , be the midpoint of , and be the intersection of and . We now claim that . First note that, since and [this is because ], we have that . Then , and , so . We earlier stated that , so we have that from SAS similarity. We have that , , and are collinear, and since and are on the same side of line , we can see that from SAS. Therefore , so , , and are collinear.
Now consider triangles and . Segments and are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that . It's also not hard to show that by SAS similarity. Therefore , which implies that , , and are collinear. This completes the proof.