Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/C2"
m (New page: == Problem == Let <math>n</math> be an odd integer greater than 1 and let <math>c_1, c_2, \ldots, c_n</math> be integers. For each permutation <math>a = (a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)</math> of <...) |
(Put up a solution) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | {{ | + | We shall prove this by contradiction. Assume that for some <math>n</math>-tuple of <math>c_i</math> there does not exist two permutations <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> of <math>\{ 1, 2, \ldots,n\}</math> such that <math>n!|S(a)-S(b)</math>. Note that there are <math>n!</math> distinct permutations of <math>\{1, 2, \ldots,n\}</math>, which means there are <math>n!</math> distinct sums <math>S(a)</math>. Since no two of them are congruent modulo <math>n!</math>, we have that the set of all <math>S(a)</math> for some <math>n</math>-tuple of <math>c_i</math> is a congruence class modulo <math>n!</math>. This means that the sum of every <math>S(a)</math> is congruent to <math>\sum_{i=0}^{n!-1}=\frac{(n!-1)n!}{2}</math>. However, that same sum is congruent to |
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(c_i\sum_{j=1}^{n} (n-1)!*a_j\right)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i\cdot \frac{n(n+1)(n-1)!}{2}=\frac{c_i(n+1)!}{2}\bmod{n!}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that <math>2|n+1</math>, so <math>n!|\frac{(n+1)!}{2}</math>, so <math>n!</math> divides the sum. However, the sum is also congruent to <math>\frac{(n!-1)n!}{2}</math> modulo <math>n!</math>, and <math>n!-1</math> is odd, so <math>n!</math> couldn't possibly divide the sum. This leads to a contradiction, so our previous assumption must be false. This proves the problem statement. | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == |
Revision as of 07:50, 31 August 2011
Problem
Let be an odd integer greater than 1 and let be integers. For each permutation of , define . Prove that there exist permutations of such that is a divisor of .
Solution
We shall prove this by contradiction. Assume that for some -tuple of there does not exist two permutations and of such that . Note that there are distinct permutations of , which means there are distinct sums . Since no two of them are congruent modulo , we have that the set of all for some -tuple of is a congruence class modulo . This means that the sum of every is congruent to . However, that same sum is congruent to
Note that , so , so divides the sum. However, the sum is also congruent to modulo , and is odd, so couldn't possibly divide the sum. This leads to a contradiction, so our previous assumption must be false. This proves the problem statement.