Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mathematicial notation"
ComplexZeta (talk | contribs) |
Mysmartmouth (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Okay, but that ought to change. That notation is losing popularity in mathematics in general. --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 11:08, 27 June 2006 (EDT) | Okay, but that ought to change. That notation is losing popularity in mathematics in general. --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 11:08, 27 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, Please talk to ZetaX about that. I'm not sure that he's seen this article on AoPS Wiki yet, even though I told him about it. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 11:15, 27 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:15, 27 June 2006
I copied this from the AoPS Formulary, and it needs to be converted to Wiki format. Please help! Also, credit for writing this GREAT article goes to ZetaX. --Sean 23:56, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I take issue with the notation 
for integers modulo n. When n is prime, this notation is used for the p-adic integers, which do not really have any other notation (well perhaps 
, but that's not much different). --ComplexZeta 01:22, 27 June 2006 (EDT)
I also don't like the notation , but that is what most people use on ML/AoPS.
Okay, but that ought to change. That notation is losing popularity in mathematics in general. --ComplexZeta 11:08, 27 June 2006 (EDT)
OK, Please talk to ZetaX about that. I'm not sure that he's seen this article on AoPS Wiki yet, even though I told him about it. --Sean 11:15, 27 June 2006 (EDT)
