Difference between revisions of "2005 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
m (→See Also) |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
The number of possible 4-tuples <math>(k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4)</math> is thus <math>1^2+2^2+...+n^2+(n+1)^2+n^2+...+2^2+1^2</math>, which is equivalent to <math>(1^2+2^2+...+(n+1)^2)+(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)</math>. Our final answer is <math>\dfrac{(n+1)(n+2)(2n+3)}{6}+\dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\boxed{\dfrac{2n^3+6n^2+7n+3}{3}}</math>. | The number of possible 4-tuples <math>(k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4)</math> is thus <math>1^2+2^2+...+n^2+(n+1)^2+n^2+...+2^2+1^2</math>, which is equivalent to <math>(1^2+2^2+...+(n+1)^2)+(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)</math>. Our final answer is <math>\dfrac{(n+1)(n+2)(2n+3)}{6}+\dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\boxed{\dfrac{2n^3+6n^2+7n+3}{3}}</math>. | ||
− | + | == See Also== | |
{{USAMO newbox|year=2005|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{USAMO newbox|year=2005|num-b=3|num-a=5}} |
Revision as of 18:04, 11 April 2013
Contents
[hide]Problem
Legs of a square table each have length , where is a positive integer. For how many ordered 4-tuples of nonnegative integers can we cut a piece of length from the end of leg and still have a stable table?
(The table is stable if it can be placed so that all four of the leg ends touch the floor. Note that a cut leg of length 0 is permitted.)
Solutions
Solution 1
Let be the number of sets of cuts that result in the longest leg being of length . Then , and we will evaluate to develop a recursion. Note that if a set of cuts has non-zero cuts, then if that set is counted in , subtract from each of the cuts to obtain a set of cuts that is counted in . For example, if was counted in , then would have been counted in because subtracting the same length from each leg preserves the quality of the legs being coplanar, and there is a bijection.
Now we must evaluate those sets of cuts that don't fall in this bijection, which are clearly those where one leg is completely cut off. After some simple geometric reasoning that I won't include here, we see that one corner has a leg of length of zero, and the opposite leg, called the initial leg, will have length If the remaining legs have length and , then , so options. The initial corner can be any of the four legs, but each of the four permutations of the set of cuts is repeated twice, so we have total additional sets of cuts. We conclude that , and note that . Now we can create generating functions. . Also, . From the recursion, we have This final equation is easy to analyze. Simply use as the first term of a geometric series with constant multiplier of . This gives . The total number of sets of cuts for a table of legs of length is the sum of all the , , from which we deduce the answer , or .
Solution 2
The problem's condition is that the ends of the legs must be coplanar. So the plane formed by legs , , and is the same as the plane formed by the legs , , and iff the problem's condition is met.
We now assign coordinates to the ends of the legs. Let the table be on the xy-plane such that is at , is at , is at , and is at , where is the side length of the table. (Note that we have turned the table over so that the top lies on the xy plane while the legs point in the +z direction - this does not affect the result.) A plane in 3-space has the equation form . Plugging the coordinates of , , and into , we eventually get , , . Plugging the coordinates of , , and into , we get , , .
Since we need these to be coplanar, we set , , and . (Notice that the 's cancel.) From , we get [1]. From , we get [2]. From , we get [3]. Notice that [1] and [2] can both be obtained directly from [3] and are therefore redundant. The only condition we have left to ensure that the ends of the legs are coplanar is . Let .
We proceed using casework by . is an integer between and , inclusive. Furthermore, we note that range from to , inclusive. For , each of and have one choice, . For , they each have two choices, and . And so on, until , where they each have choices: . When , the restriction that takes effect: there are only choices for each ordered pair, which are . And so on, until , where there is one choice for each ordered pair, .
The number of possible 4-tuples is thus , which is equivalent to . Our final answer is .
See Also
2005 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |