Difference between revisions of "1999 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution 2) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Without loss of generality let <math>a_1 \le a_2 \le a_3 \le ... \le a_n < 2</math>, and let <math>k</math> be the largest integer such that <math>a_k \le 0</math> and <math>0 \le a_{k+1}</math> if it exists, or 0 if all the <math>a_i</math> are non-negative. If <math>k = 0</math>, then (as <math>n \ge 4</math>) <math>\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 < \sum_{i=1}^n 4 = 4n \le n^2</math>, a contradiction. Hence, assume <math>n \ge k \ge 1</math>. Then | Without loss of generality let <math>a_1 \le a_2 \le a_3 \le ... \le a_n < 2</math>, and let <math>k</math> be the largest integer such that <math>a_k \le 0</math> and <math>0 \le a_{k+1}</math> if it exists, or 0 if all the <math>a_i</math> are non-negative. If <math>k = 0</math>, then (as <math>n \ge 4</math>) <math>\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 < \sum_{i=1}^n 4 = 4n \le n^2</math>, a contradiction. Hence, assume <math>n \ge k \ge 1</math>. Then | ||
− | < | + | <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^k a_i \ge n - \sum_{i=k+1}^n a_i > n - 2(n-k) = 2k - n.</cmath> |
− | Because < | + | Because <math>a_i \le 0</math> for <math>i \le k</math>, both sides of the inequality are non-positive, so squaring flips the sign. But we also know that <math>a_i a_j \ge 0</math> for <math>i, j \le k</math>, so |
<cmath>\sum_{i=0}^k a_i^2 \le \left(\sum_{i=0}^k a_i \right)^2 < (2k - n)^2 = 4k^2 - 4kn + n^2,</cmath> | <cmath>\sum_{i=0}^k a_i^2 \le \left(\sum_{i=0}^k a_i \right)^2 < (2k - n)^2 = 4k^2 - 4kn + n^2,</cmath> | ||
which results in | which results in |
Revision as of 15:26, 28 September 2014
Contents
Problem
Let () be real numbers such that Prove that .
Solution
First, suppose all the are positive. Then Suppose, on the other hand, that without loss of generality, with . If we are done, so suppose that . Then , so Since is a positive real for all , it follows that
\[\sum_{i=k+1}^n a_i^2 \le \left( \sum_{i=k+1}^n} -a_i \right)^2 \le (2k-n)^2 .\] (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
Then Since , . It follows that , as desired.
Solution 2
Assume the contrary and suppose each is less than 2.
Without loss of generality let , and let be the largest integer such that and if it exists, or 0 if all the are non-negative. If , then (as ) , a contradiction. Hence, assume . Then Because for , both sides of the inequality are non-positive, so squaring flips the sign. But we also know that for , so which results in a contradiction to our given condition. The proof is complete.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1999 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.