Difference between revisions of "1988 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"
m (→Solution 2) |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
+ | ===Solution 1=== | ||
By Vieta's Formulas, <math>a=-r-s-t</math>, <math>b=rs+st+rt</math>, and <math>c=-rst</math>. | By Vieta's Formulas, <math>a=-r-s-t</math>, <math>b=rs+st+rt</math>, and <math>c=-rst</math>. | ||
Now we know <math>k=a^2-3b</math>; in terms of r, s, and t, then, | Now we know <math>k=a^2-3b</math>; in terms of r, s, and t, then, | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
In fact, the problem tells us this is true. Q.E.D. | In fact, the problem tells us this is true. Q.E.D. | ||
− | ==Solution 2== | + | ===Solution 2=== |
From Vieta's Formula (which tells us that <math>a = -(r+s+t)</math> and <math>b = rs + st + rt</math>), we have that | From Vieta's Formula (which tells us that <math>a = -(r+s+t)</math> and <math>b = rs + st + rt</math>), we have that | ||
<cmath>k = a^2 - 3b = r^2 + s^2 + t^2 - rs - st - rt = \frac{1}{2} ((r-s)^2 + (s-t)^2 + (r-t)^2),</cmath> | <cmath>k = a^2 - 3b = r^2 + s^2 + t^2 - rs - st - rt = \frac{1}{2} ((r-s)^2 + (s-t)^2 + (r-t)^2),</cmath> |
Revision as of 18:59, 18 July 2016
Contents
[hide]Problem
The cubic polynomial has real coefficients and three real roots
. Show that
and that
.
Solution
Solution 1
By Vieta's Formulas, ,
, and
.
Now we know
; in terms of r, s, and t, then,
Now notice that we can multiply both sides by 2, and rearrange terms to get
.
But since
, the three terms of the RHS are all non-negative (as the square of a real number is always non-negative), and therefore their sum is also non-negative -- that is,
.
Now, we will show that .
We can square both sides, and the inequality will hold since they are both non-negative (it is given that
, therefore
). This gives
.
Now we already have
, so substituting this for k gives
Note that this is a quadratic. Since its leading coefficient is positive, its value is less than 0 when s is between the two roots. Using the quadratic formula:
The quadratic is 0 when s is equal to r or t, and the inequality
holds when its value is less than or equal to 0 -- that is,
.
(Its value is less than or equal to 0 when s is between the roots, since the
graph of the quadratic opens upward.)
In fact, the problem tells us this is true. Q.E.D.
Solution 2
From Vieta's Formula (which tells us that and
), we have that
clearly non-negative. To prove
, it suffices to prove the square of this relation, or
This in turn simplifies to
or
which is clearly true as
. This completes the proof.
See Also
1988 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.