Difference between revisions of "2011 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution 2) |
Willwin4sure (talk | contribs) m (→Problem) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''This problem is from both the 2011 USAJMO and the 2011 USAMO, so both problems redirect here.'' | ''This problem is from both the 2011 USAJMO and the 2011 USAMO, so both problems redirect here.'' | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
− | Consider the assertion that for each positive integer <math>n \ge 2</math>, the remainder upon dividing <math>2^{2^n}</math> by <math>2^n-1</math> is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with proof) a | + | Consider the assertion that for each positive integer <math>n \ge 2</math>, the remainder upon dividing <math>2^{2^n}</math> by <math>2^n-1</math> is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with proof) a counter-example. |
==Solution== | ==Solution== |
Revision as of 09:27, 27 November 2016
This problem is from both the 2011 USAJMO and the 2011 USAMO, so both problems redirect here.
Contents
Problem
Consider the assertion that for each positive integer , the remainder upon dividing by is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with proof) a counter-example.
Solution
We will show that is a counter-example.
Since , we see that for any integer , . Let be the residue of . Note that since and , necessarily , and thus the remainder in question is . We want to show that is an odd power of 2 for some , and thus not a power of 4.
Let for some odd prime . Then . Since 2 is co-prime to , we have and thus
Therefore, for a counter-example, it suffices that be odd. Choosing , we have . Therefore, and thus Since is not a power of 4, we are done.
Solution 2
Lemma (useful for all situations): If x and y are positive integers such that divides , then x divides y. Proof: . Replacing the 1 with a and dividing out the powers of two should create an easy induction proof which will be left to the reader as an Exercise.
Consider n = 25. We will prove that this case is a counterexample via contradiction.
Because 4 = , we will assume there exists a positive integer k such that divides and . Dividing the powers of 2 from LHS gives divides . Hence, divides n. Because n = 25 is odd, divides 25. Modular arithmetic (in particular, Euler's totient function for 25 equals 20) gives and so k ≥ 16. However, , a contradiction. Thus, n = 25 is a valid counterexample.
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.
See also
2011 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |